The first ten minutes of McG’s “3 Days to Kill” is your standard hodgepodge of action movie what-have-ya. Gunfire and explosions and mysterious briefcases and purposeful striding through hotel hallways and a man – Ethan Renner (Kevin Costner), CIA cleaner – who has to call his daughter for her birthday in the midst of all this action movie what-have-ya because, well, I think it increases “the stakes”. Then Ethan has a coughing fit and starts seeing blurry and collapses and the bad guy gets away and he finds out he has brain cancer with a diagnosis of three months to live, and all that action movie what-have-ya ends up seeming pretty pointless. So he decides to re-win the affection of the daughter, Zooey (Hallee Steinfeld), whom he never sees. But then a Vixenish CIA handler with the aromatic moniker Vivi Delay (Amber Heard) approaches with government-approved proposal – she can keep him alive with an experimental drug (that requires swigs of vodka to maintain balance) so long as he rubs a few bad dudes out.
What follows is high-octane trash, director McG garnering a crucial assist from his screenwriter, French auteur Luc Besson (co-writer: Adi Hasak), a man who as evinced by the phenomenal “Lucy” knows how to blend the ludicrous with the sublime. And in spite of a third-act wrap-up that unfortunately just doesn’t bounce as aggressively off the wall as the rest of the film, it is subtle high comedy. It’s particularly inspired when mixing parallel ideas of schmaltzy domestic drama and hardenered thriller, such as a devilishly awkward moment when Ethan forces the Italian man he is torturing to give his daughter a pasta recipe over the phone. Family first. It is less successful in its more traditional sequences of ferreting out bad men walled off behind reams of bodyguards and in-broad-daylight car chases, all which feel worn to the nub. Not for nothing is the most invigorating transportation sequence not a car chase but a saddened Ethan riding the purple bicycle his daughter has rejected as a gift because, like, seriously, it’s purple and she’s way too old for a purple bike, man.
Even better are the scenes of Vivi squiring Ethan to and fro in her no doubt Langley-approved hot rod, specifically because she’s not trying to outrun anybody, she’s turning and burning just because she can, which is pretty much the movie’s entire modus operandi. Plot-wise, I’d struggle to tell you all that was happening. The primary objective, as I hazily recall, was something along the lines of nabbing some uber-bad dude called The Wolf or The Albino or The Butcher or The Baker or The Candlestick Maker. That’s irrelevant.
Late in the film when Vivi orders Ethan to wear a “disguise”, he simply removes his scarf and jacket and jeans and slips into a suit. That’s it. That’s his whole cover. A suit. He’s recognized in about four seconds. Because it’s not about being in “disguise”, you see, it’s about being en vogue. Which is what Vivi grasps and which is why Vivi is the one who orders him to wear it. She spends her majority of screen time donning an assortment of wigs for no real reason other than to don an assortment of wigs. On “Alias” Jennifer Garner’s Sidney Bristow was always donning wigs to ostensibly aid in her various spying shenanigans when the real motivation was to have Jennifer Garner don an assortment of wigs. “3 Days to Kill” is just entirely up front about it, portraying the Spy Game as an International Parlor Game.
In a way, this whole story seems to be for the amusement of Vivi. Costner, with a few extra rocks of gravel in his voice, plays the part with a decided bedraggledness that feels less like brain cancer than a lifer employee desperately eyeing retirement. And Heard, who is all wickedly tickled smiles, feels less like a CIA handler than a femme fatale as puppetmaster, which, hey, for all we know is exactly the job description of actual CIA handlers. Consider the theoretically dramatic conclusion in which Ethan comes face to face with The Wolf or The Albino or The Butcher or The Baker or The Candlestick Maker. Suddenly, Vivi is just there, as if she had been hiding in the shadows, orchestrating the entire ordeal via chic headset, and exhorts Ethan to kill the bad dude. He defers out of ethical obligation and so she puts a slug in the bad dude’s brain. (Spoiler alert!) It’s like she had him to do all the leg work so she could disappear for large swaths of time to hit up Parisian dance clubs.
The closing shot involves Vivi standing atop a windswept hill, looking down on the beachfront property where Ethan and his family have gone for R & R, and while it is intended as something of a happy ending, and is, the subtext is both slightly voyeuristic – the CIA also keeps watch – and subtly satirical. The funniest concept in the entire film is, in fact, the one from which it springs - that is, the new-fangly medication that keeps Ethan alive, and that Vivi has chosen to give her charge even after his service is up. I mean, if the government does has a cure for cancer, you don't really think they'd tell us, do you?
Tuesday, September 30, 2014
3 Days To Kill
Labels:
3 Days To Kill,
Amber Heard,
Good Reviews (I Think),
Kevin Costner,
McG
Monday, September 29, 2014
Edge of Tomorrow
Sarah Vowell once posited that America likes watching Tom Cruise be put through the wringer - and she wrote this in January 2000, long before he infamously besmirched Oprah's fine upholstery. This hypothesis irrefutably holds up when considering "Edge of Tomorrow", Doug Liman's re-imagining of Harold Ramis's elegant time loop comic masterwork "Groundhog Day" as a futuristic "D-Day" where the human race is made to confront to an alien army of tentacled Mimics. They are called this, I reckon, because they are in the process of mimicking the Nazis' European aggressions. Who says you can't repeat the past?
The Cruise version of vain weatherman Phil Connors is Major William Cage, an unctous public relations man whose interest is maintaining and propagating the military brand in the midst of all-out war rather than getting involved in anything literally militaristic. Which is why when his superior officer (Brendan Gleeson, dryly hysterical) assigns him to the front lines of Normandy 2.0, he grins and tries to bribe his way out. Instead, he's arrested, re-cast as a deserter in an officer's uniform and thrown in with a pack of grunts. One minute he's trading exposition with Erin Burnett on CNN, the next he's in handcuffs on an army base tarmac getting kicked in the guts. He's Tom Cruise reduced to our level. Sure, he'll wind up the hero, he has to, after all, but he'll crawl through the mud to get there.
Truly there is something satirically subversive in seeing Tom Cruise, hero, strapped into a Mini Me version of a Jaeger and not know how to turn off the "safety". Even better is seeing Bill Paxton as a mustachoied Kentuckian barking orders and insults at our leading man, as if we are momentarily allowed to imagine an alternate reality where Paxton, not Cruise, is the box office luminary. And "Edge of Tomorrow" is all about indulging in alternate reality.
At the onset of the invasion, one in which the commanding officers in all their hubris have miscalculated and left themselves woefully vulnerable, Cage is killed. But not quite. Rather than saying 'sup to St. Peter, he wakes up back on the army tarmac, being kicked in the guts, his own personal "I Got You, Babe". He's destined, it seems, to re-live the invasion and his own death over and over and over, etc., for the rest of eternity. Until, that is, he meets Rita Vrataski (Emily Blunt) on the battlefield, a soldiering celebrity, which no doubt would have caused the notable feminist John Wayne to throw a monotone hissy hit. She is nicknamed The Angel Of Verdun, another military history nod and an embodiment of her role as Cage's guiding spirit. She also lived through this endless invasion loop, and has deciphered the secret - by killing an Alpha Mimic, a person gains the power to re-set time. And if they can re-set the time, they can get a leg up on the enemy.
The film is based on a book which itself was based on a video game, and this is extremely evident in the evolution of Cage's journey. He garners strength, physically and mentally, builds his combat skills, and incessantly re-strategizes with Rita. Each time he dies, he begins a "level" anew, until he conquers that level and moves to the next one. It cleverly allows the film to refresh in the moment, even as its overarching narrative is fairly boilerplate. But where "Edge of Tomorrow" significantly diverges from its Bill Murray forefather is in its protagonist's trajectory. If Phil Connors' arc was one of personal redemption then William Cage's is the more commonplace Cruise-esque Becoming The World's Savior. Which is why even in this wearying loop, even with the obligatory second act comedown in advance of the climax, there's a bit too much Spunky Explorer to the performance.
Blunt is the true counterpart to Murray, the film's secret weapon, giving it gravity, suggesting something more Shakespearean than Hollywood. Cruise may be bordering on the Edge of Tomrrow, but Blunt is mired in, to quote the prospective novel of "Sideways'" Miles Raymond, The Day After Yesterday. Yes, she's an action heroine, and yes, Liman's camera repeatedly ogles her in the midst of musclebound yoga as her respective Sonny & Cher trigger, and yes, the script grafts on some blah attempt at romance. But her performance is intense, meditative, emitting a soulfulness I wish more turns in would-be blockbusters would have the guts to try. The character's exhaustion is palpable and suggestive of a different movie lurking just underneath this very good one.
Every attempt made by Cage to "get to know" Rita, she rebuffs, a subtle reminder amidst all the effects and bouts of heroism that no matter how much time we spend in the company of another person, we never really get to know them at all.
The Cruise version of vain weatherman Phil Connors is Major William Cage, an unctous public relations man whose interest is maintaining and propagating the military brand in the midst of all-out war rather than getting involved in anything literally militaristic. Which is why when his superior officer (Brendan Gleeson, dryly hysterical) assigns him to the front lines of Normandy 2.0, he grins and tries to bribe his way out. Instead, he's arrested, re-cast as a deserter in an officer's uniform and thrown in with a pack of grunts. One minute he's trading exposition with Erin Burnett on CNN, the next he's in handcuffs on an army base tarmac getting kicked in the guts. He's Tom Cruise reduced to our level. Sure, he'll wind up the hero, he has to, after all, but he'll crawl through the mud to get there.
Truly there is something satirically subversive in seeing Tom Cruise, hero, strapped into a Mini Me version of a Jaeger and not know how to turn off the "safety". Even better is seeing Bill Paxton as a mustachoied Kentuckian barking orders and insults at our leading man, as if we are momentarily allowed to imagine an alternate reality where Paxton, not Cruise, is the box office luminary. And "Edge of Tomorrow" is all about indulging in alternate reality.
At the onset of the invasion, one in which the commanding officers in all their hubris have miscalculated and left themselves woefully vulnerable, Cage is killed. But not quite. Rather than saying 'sup to St. Peter, he wakes up back on the army tarmac, being kicked in the guts, his own personal "I Got You, Babe". He's destined, it seems, to re-live the invasion and his own death over and over and over, etc., for the rest of eternity. Until, that is, he meets Rita Vrataski (Emily Blunt) on the battlefield, a soldiering celebrity, which no doubt would have caused the notable feminist John Wayne to throw a monotone hissy hit. She is nicknamed The Angel Of Verdun, another military history nod and an embodiment of her role as Cage's guiding spirit. She also lived through this endless invasion loop, and has deciphered the secret - by killing an Alpha Mimic, a person gains the power to re-set time. And if they can re-set the time, they can get a leg up on the enemy.
The film is based on a book which itself was based on a video game, and this is extremely evident in the evolution of Cage's journey. He garners strength, physically and mentally, builds his combat skills, and incessantly re-strategizes with Rita. Each time he dies, he begins a "level" anew, until he conquers that level and moves to the next one. It cleverly allows the film to refresh in the moment, even as its overarching narrative is fairly boilerplate. But where "Edge of Tomorrow" significantly diverges from its Bill Murray forefather is in its protagonist's trajectory. If Phil Connors' arc was one of personal redemption then William Cage's is the more commonplace Cruise-esque Becoming The World's Savior. Which is why even in this wearying loop, even with the obligatory second act comedown in advance of the climax, there's a bit too much Spunky Explorer to the performance.
Blunt is the true counterpart to Murray, the film's secret weapon, giving it gravity, suggesting something more Shakespearean than Hollywood. Cruise may be bordering on the Edge of Tomrrow, but Blunt is mired in, to quote the prospective novel of "Sideways'" Miles Raymond, The Day After Yesterday. Yes, she's an action heroine, and yes, Liman's camera repeatedly ogles her in the midst of musclebound yoga as her respective Sonny & Cher trigger, and yes, the script grafts on some blah attempt at romance. But her performance is intense, meditative, emitting a soulfulness I wish more turns in would-be blockbusters would have the guts to try. The character's exhaustion is palpable and suggestive of a different movie lurking just underneath this very good one.
Every attempt made by Cage to "get to know" Rita, she rebuffs, a subtle reminder amidst all the effects and bouts of heroism that no matter how much time we spend in the company of another person, we never really get to know them at all.
Labels:
Edge of Tomorrow,
Emily Blunt,
Good Reviews,
Tom Cruise
Friday, September 26, 2014
Friday's Old Fashioned: Love Crazy (1941)
In screwball comedies, the male protagonist is often self-impressed, set in his ways, only to have, in a series of farcical hijinks, a tough-talking, no-crap-talking female upend his status quo and broaden his worldview while simultaneously making him do what he heretofore thought impossible and fall head over heels. In Jack Conway’s “Love Crazy”, however, the male and female protagonists, Steve (William Powell) and Susan (Myrna Loy) Ireland, are presumably already well past this stage. This is because the film opens on the verge of their fourth wedding anniversary celebration, not even the faintest whiff of marital discord in the air. It's as if the crumbling of Steve's self-impressed ways happened in a non-existent prequel and we are now catching up with him in movie #2 where he is full-grown and respectful.
Therefore, the status quo in “Love Crazy” that requires toppling is Love & Happiness, which means the gods of machine must intervene. And they do in an elongated sequence to open the film set entirely within the couple's apartment building that finds the husband in question stuck on an elevator with his ex-flame of many moons ago, Kimble Grayson (Gail Patrick), who, per fate, lives one apartment below her former suitor and conspires to get him into her apartment for a cocktail while her own oafish husband is out. Steve, of course, neglects to mention this to Susan. She, of course, ascertains this info anyway and instantly becomes so suspicious that she conspires to pretend to be having an affair with Kimble's husband only to, of course, wind up in the apartment of a pompous archer (Jack Carson) instead.
Conway handles this rigmarole with deft professionalism, though it requires Powell to generally forgo quick-witted repartee for more physical hijinks. He's Buster Keaton as opposed to.....well.....William Powell. Which isn't to say Powell can't do Keaton - or a version of Keaton, I should say - but that wego to the cinema turn on Turner Classic Movies to watch Powell be Powell, not Keaton, don't we?
We also want to watch Loy be Loy, and yet she comes across more in this film like a supporting character than a co-star. The suspicions regarding her spouse’s infidelity drives the plot and, okay, yes, sure, there is something suspicious about discovering your husband of four years was just in the apartment of the woman to whom he was once engaged and that he purposely neglected informing you. But, I submit that Loy, in all her Loy-ness, would be able to ferret out the truth with but a few pointed questions.
Still, the greatest irony of “Love Crazy” is that splitting up Powell & Loy is not simply its singular weakness but also its singular strength. Because upon being split up, Powell is forced to resort to all sorts of wacky measures to win his way back into her heart, which includes an accidental detour to an asylum (“Love Crazy”) and him dressing up like a woman, because, you know, sure, amongst numerous other hijinks. It is a strength precisely because there is something whimsically reassuring in knowing that even when the universe conspires against his character to eradicate their courtship, he is willing to go such lengths to re-establish it.
Of all the uber-glorious romantic pairings of the Hollywood’s Golden Age, no one worked side-by-side as often as Powell & Loy, teaming up thirteen times in fourteen years, and kicking up some of the most entertaining sparks the silver screen ever saw. Yet only when the pairing is taken away midstream did I suddenly realize how much I took it for granted, how much I chose to watch this specific film to see them together. Absence only makes the cinephile's heart grow more desperate, and so by the end, I was rooting for the inevitable in spite of that very inevitability.
Therefore, the status quo in “Love Crazy” that requires toppling is Love & Happiness, which means the gods of machine must intervene. And they do in an elongated sequence to open the film set entirely within the couple's apartment building that finds the husband in question stuck on an elevator with his ex-flame of many moons ago, Kimble Grayson (Gail Patrick), who, per fate, lives one apartment below her former suitor and conspires to get him into her apartment for a cocktail while her own oafish husband is out. Steve, of course, neglects to mention this to Susan. She, of course, ascertains this info anyway and instantly becomes so suspicious that she conspires to pretend to be having an affair with Kimble's husband only to, of course, wind up in the apartment of a pompous archer (Jack Carson) instead.
Conway handles this rigmarole with deft professionalism, though it requires Powell to generally forgo quick-witted repartee for more physical hijinks. He's Buster Keaton as opposed to.....well.....William Powell. Which isn't to say Powell can't do Keaton - or a version of Keaton, I should say - but that we
We also want to watch Loy be Loy, and yet she comes across more in this film like a supporting character than a co-star. The suspicions regarding her spouse’s infidelity drives the plot and, okay, yes, sure, there is something suspicious about discovering your husband of four years was just in the apartment of the woman to whom he was once engaged and that he purposely neglected informing you. But, I submit that Loy, in all her Loy-ness, would be able to ferret out the truth with but a few pointed questions.
Still, the greatest irony of “Love Crazy” is that splitting up Powell & Loy is not simply its singular weakness but also its singular strength. Because upon being split up, Powell is forced to resort to all sorts of wacky measures to win his way back into her heart, which includes an accidental detour to an asylum (“Love Crazy”) and him dressing up like a woman, because, you know, sure, amongst numerous other hijinks. It is a strength precisely because there is something whimsically reassuring in knowing that even when the universe conspires against his character to eradicate their courtship, he is willing to go such lengths to re-establish it.
Of all the uber-glorious romantic pairings of the Hollywood’s Golden Age, no one worked side-by-side as often as Powell & Loy, teaming up thirteen times in fourteen years, and kicking up some of the most entertaining sparks the silver screen ever saw. Yet only when the pairing is taken away midstream did I suddenly realize how much I took it for granted, how much I chose to watch this specific film to see them together. Absence only makes the cinephile's heart grow more desperate, and so by the end, I was rooting for the inevitable in spite of that very inevitability.
Labels:
Friday's Old Fashioned,
Love Crazy,
Myrna Loy,
William Powell
Thursday, September 25, 2014
Opening Titles Done Right
I saw someone on Twitter the other night postulate that "The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo" is the only film in the last 5, 10 years with a really riveting opening title sequence.
My rebuttal?
Labels:
Duplicity
Wednesday, September 24, 2014
Kathryn Bigelow Makes 5 Movies You Didn't Know Could Emotionally Destroy You
I had not seen Neko Case live since 2009 and, believe it or not, I had somehow forgotten how good she is live – the supreme overpoweringness of her voice. Sweet Mary mother of God, that voice. It batters you like a hurricane, but you don’t flee. You can’t flee. You can only stand there and smile and appreciate it and let it wrap you in its intense embrace. And made me think about what Neko Case could do with other songs. I’m not talking about classic songs, like “Farewell Angelina”, which if she sang…..like, damn. No, I’m talking about songs that shouldn’t necessarily pulverize you. Think, for example, about Neko Case re-imagining “Margaritaville.” Think about her singing the line “Wasting away again in Margaritaville” and think about how emphatically she'd belt “Wasting.” Hearing her cover it, you wouldn't think of Parrotheads - you'd think of a dispirited man slumped at a tropical bar during the storm season with a warm Corona and a serious alimony check he just wrote that's about to bounce. That long lost shaker of salt would be a metaphor for life, man. It'd be the cover album to end all cover albums - Neko Case: Songs That You Didn’t Know Could Emotionally Destroy You.
Then, the other night, when I stumbled upon Kathryn Bigelow’s 1991 opus “Point Break” showing on the Sundance Channel (wait, what?), I flashed back to Neko Case singing songs you never thought could emotionally destroy you. Because really, I never thought that a film about surfing bank robbers starring Keanu Reeves could emotionally destroy me, but when Patrick Swayze is standing on the beach before the herculean waves of the mystical 50 Year Storm - “it's not tragic do die doing what you love” - it never fails to emotionally destroy me. But that's what Kathryn Bigelow, auteur extraordinaire, did do and can do. And it got me to thinking.
It got me to thinking about other movies Kathryn Bigelow could have made. It got me to thinking specifically about movies that you never would have thought could have emotionally destroyed you but that in the hands of Kathryn Bigelow could have left you welling up and reaching for the Kleenex and rising from your seat and applauding with simultaneous cries of delirious "Bravo!".
Terminal Velocity. It's not so much the premise - though, rest assured, Bigelow could make a premise of a KGB agent and skydiver battling the Russian mafia over gold sing - and it's definitely not anything to do with Charlie Sheen. No, it's the presence of one Natassja Kinski, because I often like to imagine an alternate reality where Bigelow/Kinski is like Cameron/Schwarzenegger. Oh, 'tis a beautiful dream.
30 Days of Night. Kathryn's already kicked ass on one vampire film so why not take a crack at another with an immaculate foundation - a remote Alaskan town undergoing a monthlong Polar Night resultilng an obligatory vampire outbreak - that went so wasted. She could jettison Josh Hartnett, bump Melissa George up to the primary role and let the arctic atmospherics ooooooooooooooze.
Quicksilver. Because I'm pretty sure we need Bigelow to make a bike messenger movie. Her “Quicksilver” would be to “Premium Rush” as “Casablanca” is to “Havana”.
Money Train. This, I feel like, almost isn't even playing fair. This is like LeBron James in a layup line. Give Ms. Bigelow a film starring Wesley Snipes and Woody Harrelson as foster brothers, a subway train piled high with stacks of cash, Jennifer Lopez as a character named Grace Santiago, and she'd do the rest. They'd be pulling two dudes out of the audience on a nightly basis around the world to play Wesley and Woody in the stage version. This thing'd have a Criterion edition.
Raise the Titanic. The tag: They said that God himself couldn't sink it. Now they say that no man could raise it. And he can't. Because only she can. Jessica Chastain stars in.....“Raise The Titanic”.
Then, the other night, when I stumbled upon Kathryn Bigelow’s 1991 opus “Point Break” showing on the Sundance Channel (wait, what?), I flashed back to Neko Case singing songs you never thought could emotionally destroy you. Because really, I never thought that a film about surfing bank robbers starring Keanu Reeves could emotionally destroy me, but when Patrick Swayze is standing on the beach before the herculean waves of the mystical 50 Year Storm - “it's not tragic do die doing what you love” - it never fails to emotionally destroy me. But that's what Kathryn Bigelow, auteur extraordinaire, did do and can do. And it got me to thinking.
It got me to thinking about other movies Kathryn Bigelow could have made. It got me to thinking specifically about movies that you never would have thought could have emotionally destroyed you but that in the hands of Kathryn Bigelow could have left you welling up and reaching for the Kleenex and rising from your seat and applauding with simultaneous cries of delirious "Bravo!".
Kathryn Bigelow Makes 5 Movies You Didn't Know Could Emotionally Destroy You
Terminal Velocity. It's not so much the premise - though, rest assured, Bigelow could make a premise of a KGB agent and skydiver battling the Russian mafia over gold sing - and it's definitely not anything to do with Charlie Sheen. No, it's the presence of one Natassja Kinski, because I often like to imagine an alternate reality where Bigelow/Kinski is like Cameron/Schwarzenegger. Oh, 'tis a beautiful dream.
30 Days of Night. Kathryn's already kicked ass on one vampire film so why not take a crack at another with an immaculate foundation - a remote Alaskan town undergoing a monthlong Polar Night resultilng an obligatory vampire outbreak - that went so wasted. She could jettison Josh Hartnett, bump Melissa George up to the primary role and let the arctic atmospherics ooooooooooooooze.
Quicksilver. Because I'm pretty sure we need Bigelow to make a bike messenger movie. Her “Quicksilver” would be to “Premium Rush” as “Casablanca” is to “Havana”.
Money Train. This, I feel like, almost isn't even playing fair. This is like LeBron James in a layup line. Give Ms. Bigelow a film starring Wesley Snipes and Woody Harrelson as foster brothers, a subway train piled high with stacks of cash, Jennifer Lopez as a character named Grace Santiago, and she'd do the rest. They'd be pulling two dudes out of the audience on a nightly basis around the world to play Wesley and Woody in the stage version. This thing'd have a Criterion edition.
Raise the Titanic. The tag: They said that God himself couldn't sink it. Now they say that no man could raise it. And he can't. Because only she can. Jessica Chastain stars in.....“Raise The Titanic”.
Labels:
Kathryn Bigelow,
Lists
Tuesday, September 23, 2014
Love is Strange
At their small in-home wedding reception, Ben (John Lithgow) and George (Alfred Molina) celebrate by jointly occupying a piano bench and belting out “(Baby) You’ve Got What It Takes.” It’s amusing and sweet, and yet so much more. George is the one actually playing the keys, the foundation, harmonizing, as Ben demonstrably takes the lead, turning around and exhorting his family and friends, the irrepressible frontman. It is a moment evocative of the entire 39 year relationship they have at long last been allowed to officially effectuate with vows. And it is a relationship made indelible by the two lead actors, effortlessly expressing the rhythms of two longtime co-habitants and the ensuing emotional trauma that occurs when they are forced apart.
Soon after saying “I do”, George, choir director at a Catholic school, is fired – the church willing to accept their relationship but not their marriage, a sly dig at the arbitrary lines drawn by self-appointed conciliators of right & wrong. This puts the newlyweds in a precarious spot. No longer able to afford their current living quarters and with the search for a New York apartment akin to Percy Fawcett’s quest to find The Lost City of Z, the two men are forced to situationally separate, sort of like a same sex “Make Way For Tomorrow.”
George bunks with a pair of gay cops whose apartment is an endless revolving parade of parties while Ben takes the lower bunk bed of Joey (Charlie Tahan), the introverted high school-aged son of Elliot (Darren Burrows) and Kate (Marisa Tomei). Theoretically speaking, it might have made more sense for these roommate roles to reverse. Decidedly introspective, George finds the ceaseless sociality a drain while Ben’s semi-oblivious forthrightness triggers a myriad of predicaments in his new living quarters. But then Elliot is Ben’s nephew, and family comes first. And the love of the title stems as much from the familial variety as it does from the love shared by Ben and George.
As both writer (with Mauricio Zacharias) and director, Ira Sachs impressively resists merely making this family the convenient device by which to propagate Ben’s eccentricities, rendering them a wholly believable entity with its own problems, illustrating that proximity of those you love can hinder love just as much as separation. Joey is at a delicate moment where he is constantly on the withdrawal, except around Vlad (Eric Tabach), a friend his parents suspect might be too close. Meanwhile Elliot is hardly present, always tied up with work, and Kate struggles to finish her next novel with the Ben’s ceaselessly looming presence.
These are common ingredients but Sachs has virtually no interest in seeing them through to standard payoffs - in fact, he's barely interested in payoffs at all. The biggest piece of plot wrap-up involves George and Ben’s seemingly futile apartment search, resolved on account of an encounter so providential that Ben actually refers to this person who magically appears and grants them a place to live as an “angel.” While this might seem the epitome of screenwriting contrivance, it’s instead indicative of the film’s overall ethos.
Soon after saying “I do”, George, choir director at a Catholic school, is fired – the church willing to accept their relationship but not their marriage, a sly dig at the arbitrary lines drawn by self-appointed conciliators of right & wrong. This puts the newlyweds in a precarious spot. No longer able to afford their current living quarters and with the search for a New York apartment akin to Percy Fawcett’s quest to find The Lost City of Z, the two men are forced to situationally separate, sort of like a same sex “Make Way For Tomorrow.”
George bunks with a pair of gay cops whose apartment is an endless revolving parade of parties while Ben takes the lower bunk bed of Joey (Charlie Tahan), the introverted high school-aged son of Elliot (Darren Burrows) and Kate (Marisa Tomei). Theoretically speaking, it might have made more sense for these roommate roles to reverse. Decidedly introspective, George finds the ceaseless sociality a drain while Ben’s semi-oblivious forthrightness triggers a myriad of predicaments in his new living quarters. But then Elliot is Ben’s nephew, and family comes first. And the love of the title stems as much from the familial variety as it does from the love shared by Ben and George.
As both writer (with Mauricio Zacharias) and director, Ira Sachs impressively resists merely making this family the convenient device by which to propagate Ben’s eccentricities, rendering them a wholly believable entity with its own problems, illustrating that proximity of those you love can hinder love just as much as separation. Joey is at a delicate moment where he is constantly on the withdrawal, except around Vlad (Eric Tabach), a friend his parents suspect might be too close. Meanwhile Elliot is hardly present, always tied up with work, and Kate struggles to finish her next novel with the Ben’s ceaselessly looming presence.
These are common ingredients but Sachs has virtually no interest in seeing them through to standard payoffs - in fact, he's barely interested in payoffs at all. The biggest piece of plot wrap-up involves George and Ben’s seemingly futile apartment search, resolved on account of an encounter so providential that Ben actually refers to this person who magically appears and grants them a place to live as an “angel.” While this might seem the epitome of screenwriting contrivance, it’s instead indicative of the film’s overall ethos.
The term Love is Strange sounds rote, doesn't it, like something you'd type in on BrainyQuote. But the film never reduces its argument to sloganeering in the manner of its title, it never reinforces the false cinematic polemic that one line, one hug, one montage is a solution. It's more honest than that, yet never cynical, still quixotic.
This is implicitly captured in a shot placing Joey, weeping for reasons not to be revealed, in the right of a stairwell. To his left is a window with a view of the city street below, cars passing, one after another. The camera never moves. It never needs to. What else needs to be shown? To the right is all the pain that life brings. To left is life still going on. And so Joey wipes away his tears and descends the stairs to re-meet what looms outside. Maybe it's just a brave front. But then, aboard his skateboard, he literally rides into a sunset.
Love may be strange, but “Love is Strange” still believes in riding off into the sunset. It still believes in angels.
Labels:
Alfred Molina,
Good Reviews,
Ira Sachs,
John Lithgow,
Love is Strange
Monday, September 22, 2014
The Skeleton Twins
While I don’t know the exact nature of Kristin Wiig and Bill Hader’s friendship, I know they both arrived as co-Not Ready For Prime Time Players on NBC’s redoubtable weekend sketch show “Saturday Night Live” in 2005 and left it close to the same time (she in 2012, he in 2013). And so while it would seem apparent they had a significant amount of time to mutually hone their comedic timing, it’s also possible they developed an off-screen rapport. I offer this mere speculation on account of their considerable onscreen fraternal relationship as “The Skeleton Twins” themselves, a brother and sister, Milo and Maggie, who have not spoken in ten years since the suicide of their father.
As performers, Hader thankfully leaves the Stefan stereotype behind and forges something more authentic while Wiig, never as manic as some SNL actors, finds a perfect vessel for her low-watt mumbly line readings. And the chemistry they achieve is the film’s foremost quality, one grounded in tenderness and antagonism, and evocative of the very real way in which you can go so long without seeing someone you once knew so well and fall right back into step. Yet, as swiftly as their touchy-feely camaraderie returns, they still fail to find traction in their separate lives.
The film, directed by Craig Johnson, occurs around Halloween, which might suggest a nod to how All Hallow’s Eve is meant as a reference to the dead, to a father long gone and a mother (Joanne Gleason in a one scene walk-off) who is essentially dead to them. But anymore Halloween, in a pop-culture sense, is less about its original roots than an excuse for people to dress up in costume and be someone else for a night. Essentially this is what Maggie and Milo spend the movie doing. Their Starship “Nothing’s Gonna Stop Us Now” sing along, which at first glance evokes an unreleased SNL sketch, has a darker edge rumbling below the surface, one suggesting this performing pretense is where they escape to avoid introspection.
Having come home to stay with his sister after an unsuccessful suicide attempt, Milo passes himself off to those who don’t know any better as a semi-successful actor in L.A. with an agent when he really just waits tables at a tourist restaurant in Hollywood. His jokey defense mechanism to genuine emotional queries is so obvious that Maggie says his punchlines before he does. Not that Maggie’s any better. She is married to Lance (Luke Wilson) in one of those anciently misguided efforts to “settle down” because now you’re an “adult” and that’s what you “do”. They are trying to get pregnant, but not really, because Maggie is still taking birth control and not telling her spouse. She’s not ready to be a mom. Or maybe it’s that she’s having an affair with her scuba instructor, a subplot that feels too much like a writerly ruse, presenting her a mountain of dysfunction she needs to scale.
More successful is Milo’s sordid secret of the past, one involving an old teacher from high school (Ty Burrell) with whom he had an illicit relationship. Yet even if the teacher is consciously portrayed as emotionally abusive, the notion is imparted that Milo still found genuine emotional benefits in the connection and that losing it might have triggered his freefall as much as losing his father. This is a testament to the film’s moral cloudiness.
To be sure, “The Skeleton Twins” does not think much of the people in this world. Everyone here comes across not simply emotionally unbalanced but selfish, and cruel if their selfish needs go unrequited. Only Lance seems immune – then again, immune might not be the appropriate word to describe him. Oblivious might do him more justice. The script subtly portrays his character as ignorant of his wife’s troubling depression, jokingly dismissing it as “land mines”, assuming that it just goes away if he ignores it.
For a film, however, preaching the world’s inherent existentialism, the conclusion aligns far too neatly with the beginning and with the notion of our characters as twins. It is falsely melodramatic, as if the filmmakers didn’t quite know how to get these characters to a logical end point. Still, in its aftermath, the film’s ultimate avoidance of an Everyone’s All Better Now! ideal is welcomingly bold and rings true. Milo and Maggie have simply gotten through the darkest hour of night and made the choice to go on. That’s enough for now.
As performers, Hader thankfully leaves the Stefan stereotype behind and forges something more authentic while Wiig, never as manic as some SNL actors, finds a perfect vessel for her low-watt mumbly line readings. And the chemistry they achieve is the film’s foremost quality, one grounded in tenderness and antagonism, and evocative of the very real way in which you can go so long without seeing someone you once knew so well and fall right back into step. Yet, as swiftly as their touchy-feely camaraderie returns, they still fail to find traction in their separate lives.
The film, directed by Craig Johnson, occurs around Halloween, which might suggest a nod to how All Hallow’s Eve is meant as a reference to the dead, to a father long gone and a mother (Joanne Gleason in a one scene walk-off) who is essentially dead to them. But anymore Halloween, in a pop-culture sense, is less about its original roots than an excuse for people to dress up in costume and be someone else for a night. Essentially this is what Maggie and Milo spend the movie doing. Their Starship “Nothing’s Gonna Stop Us Now” sing along, which at first glance evokes an unreleased SNL sketch, has a darker edge rumbling below the surface, one suggesting this performing pretense is where they escape to avoid introspection.
Having come home to stay with his sister after an unsuccessful suicide attempt, Milo passes himself off to those who don’t know any better as a semi-successful actor in L.A. with an agent when he really just waits tables at a tourist restaurant in Hollywood. His jokey defense mechanism to genuine emotional queries is so obvious that Maggie says his punchlines before he does. Not that Maggie’s any better. She is married to Lance (Luke Wilson) in one of those anciently misguided efforts to “settle down” because now you’re an “adult” and that’s what you “do”. They are trying to get pregnant, but not really, because Maggie is still taking birth control and not telling her spouse. She’s not ready to be a mom. Or maybe it’s that she’s having an affair with her scuba instructor, a subplot that feels too much like a writerly ruse, presenting her a mountain of dysfunction she needs to scale.
More successful is Milo’s sordid secret of the past, one involving an old teacher from high school (Ty Burrell) with whom he had an illicit relationship. Yet even if the teacher is consciously portrayed as emotionally abusive, the notion is imparted that Milo still found genuine emotional benefits in the connection and that losing it might have triggered his freefall as much as losing his father. This is a testament to the film’s moral cloudiness.
To be sure, “The Skeleton Twins” does not think much of the people in this world. Everyone here comes across not simply emotionally unbalanced but selfish, and cruel if their selfish needs go unrequited. Only Lance seems immune – then again, immune might not be the appropriate word to describe him. Oblivious might do him more justice. The script subtly portrays his character as ignorant of his wife’s troubling depression, jokingly dismissing it as “land mines”, assuming that it just goes away if he ignores it.
For a film, however, preaching the world’s inherent existentialism, the conclusion aligns far too neatly with the beginning and with the notion of our characters as twins. It is falsely melodramatic, as if the filmmakers didn’t quite know how to get these characters to a logical end point. Still, in its aftermath, the film’s ultimate avoidance of an Everyone’s All Better Now! ideal is welcomingly bold and rings true. Milo and Maggie have simply gotten through the darkest hour of night and made the choice to go on. That’s enough for now.
Labels:
Bill Hader,
Good Reviews,
Kristin Wiig,
The Skeleton Twins
Friday, September 19, 2014
Friday's Old Fashioned: Foreign Correspondent (1940)
Throughout Alfred Hitchcock’s “Foreign Correspondent” I kept flashing back to the wise words of the mysterious Mr. X (Donald Sutherland) in Oliver Stone’s “JFK” when he said “That's the real question isn't it: why? The how and the who is just scenery for the public.” He was talking, of course, about the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, but he might as well have been talking about what the Master of Suspense was trying to do 51 years earlier in 1940 while Mother England fought to keep the Nazis at bay and America sat at the bar of neutrality having highballs.
Hitchcock made the famous the MacGuffin – that is, the object keeping the plot in motion despite possessing no fundamental importance. Like, say, the uranium being kept in the cellar of Sebastian in “Notorious.” And while one might argue the secret clause in an Allied Treaty that the obligatory bad guys are attempting to obtain is the MacGuffin of “Foreign Correspondent”, this is to miss the film’s overall point. The secret clause is merely a mini-MacGuffin and the real MacGuffin is the plot itself.
Hitchcock yearned to make a statement about America entering WWII but Hitchcock wasn’t interested in booming bells and whistles. He preferred to play the audience like a piano – and so he did, employing the memoir of Vincent Sheean as his songbook. He crafts a twisty story and tells it at a galloping pace, following a disinterested American reporter, clearly meant as a stand-in for the prevailing winds of isolationism in America at the time, named Johnny Jones (Joel McCrea) but re-christened by his editor (Harry Davenport) as the more mellifluous Huntley Haverstock. He is dispatched across the Atlantic to gather news on the simmering second great war.
There, Haverstock meets Carol Fisher (Laraine Day), the daughter of Stephen (Herbert Marshall), the man in charge of the Universal Peace Party, which has only gallant intentions. Until, of course, it doesn’t, because it turns out that Stephen is a dastardly traitor and the Universal Peace Party is pro-war and a front for an international spy ring. This means that when Haverstock falls in love with Carol and she with him, as they must, their love affair hits critical mass. Does Carol stand by her father? Can Haverstock take down the father of the woman he loves?
This relationship is theoretically the film’s weak point, one that generates nominal sparks and only exists in terms of increasing screenwriting “stakes”. Of course, that’s not really a problem, because emotional authenticity is beside the point. He’s like Conrad Brean, putting us through the paces, obfuscating the “why?” by focusing on the “who” and the “how”. But whereas in “Wag the Dog” Brean was using a phony war as a distraction from what was really going on, Hitchcock uses plot to distract us from the war taking shape off screen. When England finally declares war in “Foreign Correspondent”, you will remember it happening but you won’t necessarily remember thinking “put powder in the muskets and sharpen the bayonets!” The war doesn’t truly become tangible until a German boat shoots an American-bound jet bearing all our principal characters out of the sky, downing it in the ocean. And in that moment, the director finally reveals his hand.
Context is everything in propaganda and the notion of war in “Foreign Correspondent” is seen entirely through a personal context. Yes, sure, Hitler and his Nazi thugs were the personification of evil and in need of eradication, but the words “Hitler” and “Nazis” are never employed in the film. The argument for war is never placed into a global context. All we have to go on is what our protagonist has to go on, and all our protagonist has to go on is love and personal vendetta. And, by the end, Johnny Jones has truly been re-made into Huntley Haverstock, standing in the midst of the blitzkrieg as bombs fall and the Star Spangled Banner plays, speechifying. It's the first time all movie war has truly been mongered. "Keep those lights burning!" he implores America. "Cover them with steel! Ring them with guns! Build a canopy of battleships and bombing planes around them!"
It's like Uncle Sam is a velociraptor. One second you're looking him in the eyes on the recruiting poster, the next he's already grabbed and hooked you and signed you up. Beat to quarters! War! WE’RE GOING TO WAR! ... Wait, what happened?
Too bad Obama doesn’t have Hitch on staff.
Hitchcock made the famous the MacGuffin – that is, the object keeping the plot in motion despite possessing no fundamental importance. Like, say, the uranium being kept in the cellar of Sebastian in “Notorious.” And while one might argue the secret clause in an Allied Treaty that the obligatory bad guys are attempting to obtain is the MacGuffin of “Foreign Correspondent”, this is to miss the film’s overall point. The secret clause is merely a mini-MacGuffin and the real MacGuffin is the plot itself.
Hitchcock yearned to make a statement about America entering WWII but Hitchcock wasn’t interested in booming bells and whistles. He preferred to play the audience like a piano – and so he did, employing the memoir of Vincent Sheean as his songbook. He crafts a twisty story and tells it at a galloping pace, following a disinterested American reporter, clearly meant as a stand-in for the prevailing winds of isolationism in America at the time, named Johnny Jones (Joel McCrea) but re-christened by his editor (Harry Davenport) as the more mellifluous Huntley Haverstock. He is dispatched across the Atlantic to gather news on the simmering second great war.
There, Haverstock meets Carol Fisher (Laraine Day), the daughter of Stephen (Herbert Marshall), the man in charge of the Universal Peace Party, which has only gallant intentions. Until, of course, it doesn’t, because it turns out that Stephen is a dastardly traitor and the Universal Peace Party is pro-war and a front for an international spy ring. This means that when Haverstock falls in love with Carol and she with him, as they must, their love affair hits critical mass. Does Carol stand by her father? Can Haverstock take down the father of the woman he loves?
This relationship is theoretically the film’s weak point, one that generates nominal sparks and only exists in terms of increasing screenwriting “stakes”. Of course, that’s not really a problem, because emotional authenticity is beside the point. He’s like Conrad Brean, putting us through the paces, obfuscating the “why?” by focusing on the “who” and the “how”. But whereas in “Wag the Dog” Brean was using a phony war as a distraction from what was really going on, Hitchcock uses plot to distract us from the war taking shape off screen. When England finally declares war in “Foreign Correspondent”, you will remember it happening but you won’t necessarily remember thinking “put powder in the muskets and sharpen the bayonets!” The war doesn’t truly become tangible until a German boat shoots an American-bound jet bearing all our principal characters out of the sky, downing it in the ocean. And in that moment, the director finally reveals his hand.
Context is everything in propaganda and the notion of war in “Foreign Correspondent” is seen entirely through a personal context. Yes, sure, Hitler and his Nazi thugs were the personification of evil and in need of eradication, but the words “Hitler” and “Nazis” are never employed in the film. The argument for war is never placed into a global context. All we have to go on is what our protagonist has to go on, and all our protagonist has to go on is love and personal vendetta. And, by the end, Johnny Jones has truly been re-made into Huntley Haverstock, standing in the midst of the blitzkrieg as bombs fall and the Star Spangled Banner plays, speechifying. It's the first time all movie war has truly been mongered. "Keep those lights burning!" he implores America. "Cover them with steel! Ring them with guns! Build a canopy of battleships and bombing planes around them!"
It's like Uncle Sam is a velociraptor. One second you're looking him in the eyes on the recruiting poster, the next he's already grabbed and hooked you and signed you up. Beat to quarters! War! WE’RE GOING TO WAR! ... Wait, what happened?
Too bad Obama doesn’t have Hitch on staff.
Thursday, September 18, 2014
5 More Roles In Which Liam Neeson Could Find People
Well, it happened again. I'm watching the "Walk Among the Tombstones" trailer and, sure enough, Liam Neeson, the primary bad guy-finder at the multiplex anymore, is tasked with finding someone - a kidnapped wife of a drug dealer, in this case. Now, I understand that "Walk Among the Tombstones" is based on a novel (by Lawrence Frank) and so I know its case of an ornery dude finding someone existed well before Mr. Neeson turned into the cinema's pre-eminent people finder but nevertheless, I could not help but be stricken in its aftermath by thoughts of an assembly line of roles in which Mr. Neeson's character is structured entirely around finding people. You know what happened next.
1. As Doug Bartles, an insurance adjustor, on a Royal Caribbean Cruise, Neeson, spending the entire film in a five-dollar Hawaiian shirt, discovers some mysterious fellow passenger is passing himself off as Doug Bartles solely to get every meal on Doug Bartles' Royal Caribbean Cruise meal plan only minutes before Doug Bartles sits down to eat. Stalking the cruise ship, still in his Hawaiian shirt, from the Captain's quarters to the gaming tables, he tries to track down this charlatan. "Those are my meals," Doug Bartles growls. "So help me God, if you take the next, I will have my vengeance, on this ship or in port."
2. As Reynolds Mackey, chief security officer of KFC's so-called Secret Recipe, Neeson is called upon when the Secret Recipe Original Recipe Card is stolen by a meglomaniacal mastermind who plans to sell it to the minions of Putin for an exorbitant price. "The 'secret' isn't merely some ill-advised marketing campaign. This is a matter of national security. I will find the recipe."
3. In the second sequel to "Caddyshack", Neeson plays Angus Spackler, a distant Scottish cousin to Bill Murray's Carl, who is head groundskeeper at the old course at St. Andrews in Fife, Scotland. With a ravenous grey squirrel - less Bushwood Country Club gopher than Beast of Gévaudan - tearing up the links, Angus pledges to the gods of golf course maintenance that he will exact revenge. "The last breath this squirrel draws will be when he's face to face with me, about to have his innards extracted with my ditch blade."
4. In a nod to "Seinfeld", Neeson stars as Fred Boynton, a seemingly mild-mannered accountant from Pawtucket who purchases a radar detector off Craigslist from a mysterious seller. When the radar detector naturally goes belly up in its inaugural run and Fred is handed an impressively expensive ticket, he sends an irritable email to this faceless Craigslist rogue. "I will find you. And when I do, I will kill you. Or, at the very least, force you by very uncharitable means to compensate me for the sum of my traffic ticket."
5. As Harry Fitzgerald, single father to a teenage girl, Lisa, he discovers that his precious baby girl is being harassed by an ex-boyfriend. He tee-pees the house. He puts a cherry bomb in the mailbox. He lets the air out of Harry's tires. When Harry fields a phone call from Johnny, he lets him know the score of the game. "I know who you are. And I will find you." "Well sure," says Johnny. "You've dropped your daughter off at my house, dude." "Of course," growls Harry. "I'll be over in five minutes."
5 More Roles In Which Liam Neeson Could Find People
1. As Doug Bartles, an insurance adjustor, on a Royal Caribbean Cruise, Neeson, spending the entire film in a five-dollar Hawaiian shirt, discovers some mysterious fellow passenger is passing himself off as Doug Bartles solely to get every meal on Doug Bartles' Royal Caribbean Cruise meal plan only minutes before Doug Bartles sits down to eat. Stalking the cruise ship, still in his Hawaiian shirt, from the Captain's quarters to the gaming tables, he tries to track down this charlatan. "Those are my meals," Doug Bartles growls. "So help me God, if you take the next, I will have my vengeance, on this ship or in port."
2. As Reynolds Mackey, chief security officer of KFC's so-called Secret Recipe, Neeson is called upon when the Secret Recipe Original Recipe Card is stolen by a meglomaniacal mastermind who plans to sell it to the minions of Putin for an exorbitant price. "The 'secret' isn't merely some ill-advised marketing campaign. This is a matter of national security. I will find the recipe."
3. In the second sequel to "Caddyshack", Neeson plays Angus Spackler, a distant Scottish cousin to Bill Murray's Carl, who is head groundskeeper at the old course at St. Andrews in Fife, Scotland. With a ravenous grey squirrel - less Bushwood Country Club gopher than Beast of Gévaudan - tearing up the links, Angus pledges to the gods of golf course maintenance that he will exact revenge. "The last breath this squirrel draws will be when he's face to face with me, about to have his innards extracted with my ditch blade."
4. In a nod to "Seinfeld", Neeson stars as Fred Boynton, a seemingly mild-mannered accountant from Pawtucket who purchases a radar detector off Craigslist from a mysterious seller. When the radar detector naturally goes belly up in its inaugural run and Fred is handed an impressively expensive ticket, he sends an irritable email to this faceless Craigslist rogue. "I will find you. And when I do, I will kill you. Or, at the very least, force you by very uncharitable means to compensate me for the sum of my traffic ticket."
5. As Harry Fitzgerald, single father to a teenage girl, Lisa, he discovers that his precious baby girl is being harassed by an ex-boyfriend. He tee-pees the house. He puts a cherry bomb in the mailbox. He lets the air out of Harry's tires. When Harry fields a phone call from Johnny, he lets him know the score of the game. "I know who you are. And I will find you." "Well sure," says Johnny. "You've dropped your daughter off at my house, dude." "Of course," growls Harry. "I'll be over in five minutes."
Labels:
Liam Neeson,
Lists
Wednesday, September 17, 2014
Conference on Current World Affairs
Labels:
A Life Less Ordinary
Tuesday, September 16, 2014
Cuban Fury
The Simon Pegg cameo in “Cuban Fury” really bothers me. It bothers me because it’s entirely tangential in that Hitchcock sorta way where Alfred would make cameos in his movies not with any sort of relevancy toward the story but with “Hey! Look! It’s me! I’m here!” braggadocio. And while Pegg’s cameo isn’t that smarmy, it’s still too “Where’s Waldo?” for a film that his longtime cinematic comrade Nick Frost is fronting. Now I understand that in opening the review by mentioning the cameo I am, in fact, indulging in the cameo when indulging is precisely what the cameo itself is doing and yet…… I open by talking about the cameo because I wish to impart that for all its faults, “Cuban Fury” still proves that Frost doesn’t need his famed provocateur-in-arms for assistance.
Granted, it’s a shame that Frost, the roly poly English funnyman, could not have found a better vehicle to demonstrate his abilities as a so-called Leading Man. Frost garners a “story by” credit but the screenwriter was Jon Brown and the director was James Griffiths, but even if Salsa music was born of Cuba and even if “the history of Cuban music is one of cultural collisions,” as Ned Sublette once opined, “of voluntary and forced migrations, of religions and revolutions”, well, this “Cuban Fury” is more interested in being “Saturday Night Fever” by way of “Blades of Glory.”
In his youth, Frost’s Bruce (“from the old English saxon, meaning bush, or hedge”) had feet of Salsa dancing fury. Then bullies made him eat the sequins on his dancing outfit and he called it quits. Now it’s years later and he’s a drone at some interchangeable company for some priggish supervisor Drew (Chris O’Dowd). Until, that is, their new company president, striking American Julia Matthews (Rashida Jones) saunters in and reveals herself as a paramour of the Salsa, prompting Bruce to sets his sights on winning fair lady’s heart by seeking out his old mentor (Ian McShane, who gruffly and effortlessly makes us believe he’s sitting on an entirely intriguing story that needs to be told), re-Salsafying and remembering who he really is.
“Cuban Fury” is predictable. It founders on a series of under-imagined montages featuring Bruce kicking up his heels to Latin-styled beats while he and boorish Drew become romantic rivals for Julia’s affection, which leads us directly to the film’s overriding problem. I don’t necessarily believe that Brown and Griffiths set out to create a female character defined entirely by her pseudo-romantic entanglement because I don’t necessarily believe that they thought about the film from the perspective of Julia which might very well rule the first half of this very sentence out of order. I mean, she’s their supervisor. They are under her guidance. Yet the film ridiculously makes it seem the other way around by reducing her to a mere object of affection of her underlings. She can run a whole company but she’s still defined by her romantic status because this is 2014 and……wait, what?
What’s worse, by forcing her into this triangle, the script excepts us to believe that she would be drawn toward Drew, which is absurd because Drew, as played by O’Dowd, is a chauvinist buffoon and Julia, as played by Jones, is pure class. You don’t suspend your disbelief when the entire subplot is patently and moronically offensive.
Still, in spite of its uninventive underdog formula and unfortunate inattention to its female protagonist, “Cuban Fury” has Nick Frost, and he has a winning everyman appeal. It’s reminiscent of a Kevin James part, but whereas James would have focused on the exterior, the pratfalls and boisterous anxiety, Frost focuses on the interior, letting us feel the sadness that has gnawed away at him ever since giving up the thing he loved so much. And that getting back the thing he loved so much, allows him to fully re-connect with himself and with life.
Perhaps in “Cuban Fury 2: Havana Nights”, Frost and Jones can fly this chicken coop and ignore the mechanics of plot for the majesty of dance.
Granted, it’s a shame that Frost, the roly poly English funnyman, could not have found a better vehicle to demonstrate his abilities as a so-called Leading Man. Frost garners a “story by” credit but the screenwriter was Jon Brown and the director was James Griffiths, but even if Salsa music was born of Cuba and even if “the history of Cuban music is one of cultural collisions,” as Ned Sublette once opined, “of voluntary and forced migrations, of religions and revolutions”, well, this “Cuban Fury” is more interested in being “Saturday Night Fever” by way of “Blades of Glory.”
In his youth, Frost’s Bruce (“from the old English saxon, meaning bush, or hedge”) had feet of Salsa dancing fury. Then bullies made him eat the sequins on his dancing outfit and he called it quits. Now it’s years later and he’s a drone at some interchangeable company for some priggish supervisor Drew (Chris O’Dowd). Until, that is, their new company president, striking American Julia Matthews (Rashida Jones) saunters in and reveals herself as a paramour of the Salsa, prompting Bruce to sets his sights on winning fair lady’s heart by seeking out his old mentor (Ian McShane, who gruffly and effortlessly makes us believe he’s sitting on an entirely intriguing story that needs to be told), re-Salsafying and remembering who he really is.
“Cuban Fury” is predictable. It founders on a series of under-imagined montages featuring Bruce kicking up his heels to Latin-styled beats while he and boorish Drew become romantic rivals for Julia’s affection, which leads us directly to the film’s overriding problem. I don’t necessarily believe that Brown and Griffiths set out to create a female character defined entirely by her pseudo-romantic entanglement because I don’t necessarily believe that they thought about the film from the perspective of Julia which might very well rule the first half of this very sentence out of order. I mean, she’s their supervisor. They are under her guidance. Yet the film ridiculously makes it seem the other way around by reducing her to a mere object of affection of her underlings. She can run a whole company but she’s still defined by her romantic status because this is 2014 and……wait, what?
What’s worse, by forcing her into this triangle, the script excepts us to believe that she would be drawn toward Drew, which is absurd because Drew, as played by O’Dowd, is a chauvinist buffoon and Julia, as played by Jones, is pure class. You don’t suspend your disbelief when the entire subplot is patently and moronically offensive.
Still, in spite of its uninventive underdog formula and unfortunate inattention to its female protagonist, “Cuban Fury” has Nick Frost, and he has a winning everyman appeal. It’s reminiscent of a Kevin James part, but whereas James would have focused on the exterior, the pratfalls and boisterous anxiety, Frost focuses on the interior, letting us feel the sadness that has gnawed away at him ever since giving up the thing he loved so much. And that getting back the thing he loved so much, allows him to fully re-connect with himself and with life.
Perhaps in “Cuban Fury 2: Havana Nights”, Frost and Jones can fly this chicken coop and ignore the mechanics of plot for the majesty of dance.
Labels:
Cuban Fury,
Good Reviews,
Middling Reviews,
Nick Frost,
Rashida Jones
Monday, September 15, 2014
Trip to Italy
“Trip to Italy” is centered around two British actors, Steve Coogan and Rob Brydon, playing themselves. They are purported to be cavorting in the south of Europe as a means to chronicle food and culture for some sort of vaguely defined magazine article, but really the film is just an extended riff between two comedians. It's like a jam band that focuses on celebrity impressions in the midst of recording an 80 minute Live In Italy LP with a second side comprised entirely of “Impersonating Michael Caine In ‘The Dark Knight Rises.’” And if Coogan is the bassist, keeping the band grounded, then Rob Brydon is the lead guitarist who will not stop noodling, forever launching into another never-ending solo.
The film is helmed by Michael Winterbottom, who also helmed its predecessor, “The Trip”, which I have not seen, though by all accounts this follow-up is a virtual redux. As such, it more or less opens with the two actors referencing the difficulties of crafting a sequel that feels fresh rather than a mere retread and so the duo naturally launches into dueling “Godfather” impressions which is pretty much precisely what Jamie Kennedy did in “Scream 2” and so, frankly, this very scene attempting to cut off the retread accusations at the pass feels like a retread.
At least all the improvisational indulging befits all the gastronomy indulging, the endless meals with the ceaseless courses, the incredibly shimmering scenery that serves a decadent reminder as to why films belong on the biggest screen, visiting the haunts of English poets Lord Byron and Percy Shelley, and engaging in immensely pleasurable Alanis Morrisette sing-alongs that somehow skirt that middle ground between Ironic and Earnest. Still, there is an undertow of melancholy, specifically in romantic entanglements brilliantly presented with a flippancy reminiscent of a quote from Jennifer Grey playing Jennifer Grey on the long-since shuttered ABC sitcom “It’s Like, You Know” when she explained she’d had an affair with her co-star in Italy(!) “because we were on location and that’s what you do.” And it seems that culinary and culture voyages to Italy can’t help but include a little side helping of adultery.
That, however, is about as far as “Trip to Italy” wants to push it. If guilt is meant to impress itself upon Brydon for his choices, it is nigh impossible to feel its weight in the face of another bottle of Barolo and whimsical references to “La Dolce Vita.” Oh, there are career quibbles, like Brydon trying to land a role in a Michael Mann movie, and the film tries to draw parallels between the bombardment of impersonations and the idea that this is where he and Coogan's bread is sadly buttered, in having to assume other personas rather than their own, and that to be a comedian means trafficking in something not necessarily, shall we say, artistically high-minded. But this is all tangential, touched upon but not addressed, an attempt to infuse a series of sitting on picturesque terraces with some semblance of meaning. It is, to quote another comic, mere heavyosity.
This is a film about the funny. And it’s not that I failed to find the film funny because I did. It can be droll, it can be side-splitting. Coogan’s facial expressions, per usual, are a phenomenon, and I even enjoyed a good percentage of Brydon’s impersonations – his Pacino in particular. But. It wasn’t a lack of funny that bothered me, it was the full-frontal assault of funny, the pounding into submission with impersonations. Brydon has no off switch. Even in the most delicate of moments, he’s trotting out a Hugh Grant or a Dustin Hoffman. I felt like his poor wife, back home, talking to him via telephone and not having it when he lapses into yet another voice. “No Dustin Hoffman tonight,” she says. Sing it, sister!
You could attempt to mount an argument that this is precisely the point, that Brydon’s having no off switch is what tinges “Trip to Italy” with tragedy. Unfortunately, by the time the notably pensive (and photogenically luminous) end arrives, I had already mentally checked out from exhaustion. You can't play an hour and forty-five minute guitar solo and then try to deliver profundity in the outro. I had long since stopped listening. I just wanted the show to be over so I could go home.
The film is helmed by Michael Winterbottom, who also helmed its predecessor, “The Trip”, which I have not seen, though by all accounts this follow-up is a virtual redux. As such, it more or less opens with the two actors referencing the difficulties of crafting a sequel that feels fresh rather than a mere retread and so the duo naturally launches into dueling “Godfather” impressions which is pretty much precisely what Jamie Kennedy did in “Scream 2” and so, frankly, this very scene attempting to cut off the retread accusations at the pass feels like a retread.
At least all the improvisational indulging befits all the gastronomy indulging, the endless meals with the ceaseless courses, the incredibly shimmering scenery that serves a decadent reminder as to why films belong on the biggest screen, visiting the haunts of English poets Lord Byron and Percy Shelley, and engaging in immensely pleasurable Alanis Morrisette sing-alongs that somehow skirt that middle ground between Ironic and Earnest. Still, there is an undertow of melancholy, specifically in romantic entanglements brilliantly presented with a flippancy reminiscent of a quote from Jennifer Grey playing Jennifer Grey on the long-since shuttered ABC sitcom “It’s Like, You Know” when she explained she’d had an affair with her co-star in Italy(!) “because we were on location and that’s what you do.” And it seems that culinary and culture voyages to Italy can’t help but include a little side helping of adultery.
That, however, is about as far as “Trip to Italy” wants to push it. If guilt is meant to impress itself upon Brydon for his choices, it is nigh impossible to feel its weight in the face of another bottle of Barolo and whimsical references to “La Dolce Vita.” Oh, there are career quibbles, like Brydon trying to land a role in a Michael Mann movie, and the film tries to draw parallels between the bombardment of impersonations and the idea that this is where he and Coogan's bread is sadly buttered, in having to assume other personas rather than their own, and that to be a comedian means trafficking in something not necessarily, shall we say, artistically high-minded. But this is all tangential, touched upon but not addressed, an attempt to infuse a series of sitting on picturesque terraces with some semblance of meaning. It is, to quote another comic, mere heavyosity.
This is a film about the funny. And it’s not that I failed to find the film funny because I did. It can be droll, it can be side-splitting. Coogan’s facial expressions, per usual, are a phenomenon, and I even enjoyed a good percentage of Brydon’s impersonations – his Pacino in particular. But. It wasn’t a lack of funny that bothered me, it was the full-frontal assault of funny, the pounding into submission with impersonations. Brydon has no off switch. Even in the most delicate of moments, he’s trotting out a Hugh Grant or a Dustin Hoffman. I felt like his poor wife, back home, talking to him via telephone and not having it when he lapses into yet another voice. “No Dustin Hoffman tonight,” she says. Sing it, sister!
You could attempt to mount an argument that this is precisely the point, that Brydon’s having no off switch is what tinges “Trip to Italy” with tragedy. Unfortunately, by the time the notably pensive (and photogenically luminous) end arrives, I had already mentally checked out from exhaustion. You can't play an hour and forty-five minute guitar solo and then try to deliver profundity in the outro. I had long since stopped listening. I just wanted the show to be over so I could go home.
Labels:
Middling Reviews,
Trip to Italy
Friday, September 12, 2014
Actors as Starbucks Baristas
Yesterday I was listening to Bill Simmons’ B.S. Report podcast and his guest was the incomparably fantastic Michelle Beadle, the sports anchor who says what she wants and means what she says, and at one point their entertainingly rambling conversation touched upon the experience of going to Los Angeles Lakers games where there are so many celebrities and you become so distracted by spotting celebrities that you start to think EVERYONE is a celebrity and you assume that’s Meryl Streep a few seats over when it turns out to merely be your local Starbucks barista.
And that, as it had to, got me to thinking. It got me to thinking about actors as Starbucks baristas. What kind of Starbucks barista might they be in accordance with the Pike Place Market Type Theory?
Michael Shannon. The Irritated Barista. “What the hell is a half double decaffeinated half-caf cappuccino? Nope. Sorry. You’re gettin’ coffee, pal. Black. And if you try and put cream in that coffee, so help me God, I’ll take this Sweet ‘n Low and stuff it right up your nose.”
John Michael Higgins. The Way-Too-Personable Barista. We all know this barista. He's the barista who when you say "Can I get a venti Pike?" says "I don't know - can you?" and doesn't mean it snidely but jokingly. Like, hey, you just came in to get a cup of coffee and we're, like, already best friends!!!
Jared Leto. The Axeman Barista. He works mornings to fund his dalliances as lead guitarist for a blues influenced 70's-style rock band called Yellowknife that plays Friday nights at Evy's Lounge.
Nicole Kidman. The Overcaffeinated Barista. This isn't exactly typecasting, I know, and that's precisely the point. I’m just desperate – DESPERATE – to see what Nicole could do with this part.
Daniel Day-Lewis. Cody, The Shift Manager. He's Cody. He's the shift manager. He lives in an apartment in Silverlake. He's taking night classes in environmental policy at community college. He wears trucker hats. He goes camping on his days off. He likes hamachi and Indica IPA. He's dating Katie. She has a dog named Rufus. Sometimes he takes the dog for walks.
And that, as it had to, got me to thinking. It got me to thinking about actors as Starbucks baristas. What kind of Starbucks barista might they be in accordance with the Pike Place Market Type Theory?
Michael Shannon. The Irritated Barista. “What the hell is a half double decaffeinated half-caf cappuccino? Nope. Sorry. You’re gettin’ coffee, pal. Black. And if you try and put cream in that coffee, so help me God, I’ll take this Sweet ‘n Low and stuff it right up your nose.”
John Michael Higgins. The Way-Too-Personable Barista. We all know this barista. He's the barista who when you say "Can I get a venti Pike?" says "I don't know - can you?" and doesn't mean it snidely but jokingly. Like, hey, you just came in to get a cup of coffee and we're, like, already best friends!!!
Nicole Kidman. The Overcaffeinated Barista. This isn't exactly typecasting, I know, and that's precisely the point. I’m just desperate – DESPERATE – to see what Nicole could do with this part.
Daniel Day-Lewis. Cody, The Shift Manager. He's Cody. He's the shift manager. He lives in an apartment in Silverlake. He's taking night classes in environmental policy at community college. He wears trucker hats. He goes camping on his days off. He likes hamachi and Indica IPA. He's dating Katie. She has a dog named Rufus. Sometimes he takes the dog for walks.
Parker Posey. The Disinterested Barista. Scrolling her iPhone. Judging your latte order. Audibly sighing when you ask if you can make a slight amendment to that latte. My favorite barista. Sigh.
Labels:
Lists,
Starbucks Baristas
Thursday, September 11, 2014
When Vengeance Rings Hollow
Since 2007 I have chosen on or around the anniversary of 9/11 to re-watch Paul Greengrass's “United 93”. Yet this week, for reasons I’m not sure I could have articulated in the moment I made the decision, I reached past the “United 93” DVD for Kathryn Bigelow’s “Zero Dark Thirty” instead. In retrospect, this decision was a result of my bad mood. I think a lot of people are in bad moods these days. There is so much shit in so many corners of the world that is so profoundly fucked up that if I really stop to try and consider it I find that I can’t even fucking breathe –and no, I will not ask you to “pardon my French.” Because fuck that. The fucking world is on fucking fire. And I felt fucking pissed off. And so I guess that as an extension of this mood I didn't really desire the hope of “United 93” (and yes, in that indescribably intense concluding sequence when the passengers fight to take back the plane that’s specifically what I feel – hope). I desired……
Vengeance is the word I’m supposed to employ. I mean, isn’t that what “Zero Dark Thirty” is all about? Wasn’t that the purpose of our ten year odyssey to track down Osama bin Laden, pop a cap in his ass and hurl his remains into the sea? To have our vengeance for his masterminding of the most significant attack ever conducted on American soil? Isn’t that why the film opens with actual recordings taken from inside the Twin Towers before they fell? There are those who would argue the film does not suitably address the "why" nor suitably address America's overall involvement in Pakistan and Afghanistan, but such arguments fail to understand the film's contention that bin Laden was the predominant symbol of 9/11. His death would supply vengeance. Then we could all go back to watching Youtube in peace.
One of the significant knocks levied against Jessica Chastain’s protagonist, Maya, based on a real life CIA agent, was a lack of characterization. No home life, no loved one, no friends, no beers with the boys, no pillow fights, no diatribes about how underrated Juliana Hatfield is. It’s a knock I’ve addressed before as absurdly irrational. The point is her lack of characterization. Is there anything more profound than the utter un-profundity of this shot?
That’s her. Nothing. No one. A tall boy and a glob of candy on a non-descript couch. Hollowed out to the point of her obsession with finding Osama and nothing else. And in that way, she also becomes emblematic of America’s obsession with vengeance, with finding and punishing bin Laden in the wake of 9/11. David Thomson, my favorite film critic, compared it, unfavorably, to something born of John Wayne jingoism. Now I am rather notoriously not a John Wayne fan. In fact, I was recently at a film exhibit and I quite purposely walked right past the John Wayne display. But I also don’t entirely disagree with Mr. Thomson.
In his movies, Wayne always possessed a “pathological absence of self-doubt mak(ing) everything all right in the end.” That’s a phrase the critic Daniel Pinto used to negatively describe the character of Maya in his own “ZDR” review. He’s right about the pathological absence of self-doubt, which is a trait that Maya the character (“I know how much certainty freaks you guys out”) and Chastain the actress play straight to.
This pathological absence of self-doubt also manifests itself in the torture sequences. It manifests in the movie, of course, in the way that Maya’s initial hesitancy toward it gives way to an almost disturbingly matter-of-fact ruthlessness. “You're not being fulsome in your replies!”
But it also manifested itself in the conversation had by so many around the movie. Was it pro-torture? Was it anti-torture? Were its depictions of torture accurate or imbalanced? EVERYONE had an opinion and EVERYONE’S opinion was RIGHT (i.e. pathological absence of self-doubt). And look, when it comes to the subject of torture in the hunt for Osama bin Laden, I would contend it’s virtually impossible to know the whole truth. The government and its representatives can assert anything they damn well please, but then the government asserted they weren't spying on us until they admitted that, yeah, well, they were. Discerning the proclivity of torture in the pursuit and how much information that torture yielded until everyone involved truly comes clean (which they won't) is a fool’s errand. Perhaps the significance of torture as argued by “Zero Dark Thirty” is overstated compared to the truth stowed in a briefcase chained to some Langley operative’s wrist but torture was employed. That much we know. And the question Bigelow and her screenwriter Mark Boal seem intent to to ask is whether or not it makes – to re-borrow Mr. Pinto’s phrase – “everything” (as in, torture) “all right in the end” simply because it aided in nabbing, “for God and country”, al-Qaeda’s #1 douchebag?
Thomson writes that Maya “is the moral authority at the end of the film, surveying the corpse and nodding, as if to imply, ‘Mission accomplished.’” I respect Mr. Thomson more than any critic alive but have no earthly idea what he was watching. She nods, yes, but how he extrapolated an implication of ‘Mission accomplished’ from the manner in which Chastain nods is utterly beyond me. That nod is partly disbelief for having finally seen the mission through, but it’s so much more – it’s doubt. It’s fear. It’s Bigelow and Boal consciously setting her up this way to take her to the end point of the journey, to the point where her logistical and moral certainty and her pathological absence of self doubt suddenly run up against pointlessness. She boards the military plane. The pilot asks “Where do you want to go?”
Her only answer is tears, and as empty as all the vengeance felt watching those tears in 2012, it felt, in the aftermath of the last few months, even more empty. Two years later and we still have no idea what it really meant or where we really want to go.
Labels:
Rants,
Zero Dark Thirty
Wednesday, September 10, 2014
KEIRA KNIGHTLEY WEARS HATS!
With so much unrest and unhappiness in the world, let's take a moment today to simply see Keira Knightley wearing some hats...
Tuesday, September 09, 2014
10 Best Movie Characters You Never See
It is, of course, Anything Goes! Week here at Cinema Romantico specifically because, as established, TIFF is going down which means no one is reading this blog and because no one is reading this blog I got to thinking about characters in movies that no one sees. Characters that are discussed a lot or a discussed a little or discussed for one scene and never again but go the duration without being glimpsed. After all, isn't so often about what you don't see as about what you do see? Indeed, not reading reader, it is. And so, in that spirit.....
10. Rebecca, Rebecca. Any list about not seen characters has to begin with Hitchcock's Rebecca. And so that's what we're doing. And if you're not happy with her only checking in at #10, well, my apologies, but here at Cinema Romantico even the immaculate likes of Rebecca are no match for........
9. Penny Benjamin, Top Gun. "You've lost your qualifications as section leader three times, put in hack twice by me, with a history of high-speed passes over five air control towers and one admiral's daughter!" "Penny Benjamin?"
8. Dixie Wells, From Here To Eternity. The boxer whom Montgomery Clift's soulful Pvt. Robert E. Lee Prewitt accidentally blinded, causing him to put away his fighting gloves, the invisible pugilistic penitence he carries with him everywhere.
7. Katie Dunn, Million Dollar Baby. I could begin any treatise on any scene in Eastwood's magnum opus with the phrase "Few scenes in any movie move me as much as......" but nevertheless.....few scenes in any movie move me as much as the scene in "Million Dollar Baby" when Frankie, in a moment of genuinely melancholy reflection, exits the church to hear the Father ask "Did you write your daughter?" and Frankie simply responds "Every day." (Nick collapses into sobs.)
6. Jessup Dolly, Winter's Bone. The father of Ree Dolly and the meth-cooking fuel for her Ozarkian re-write of the Hero's Journey.
5. The Girl With The White Parasol, Citizen Kane. Everyone focuses on Rosebud when what has always most moved me to the depths of my being is Kane's manager, Bernstein (Everett Sloane), offering the following monologue as his own rumination Rosebud's meaning. "A fellow will remember a lot of things you wouldn't think he'd remember. You take me. One day, back in 1896, I was crossing over to Jersey on the ferry. And as we pulled out, there was another ferry pulling in. And on it there was a girl waiting to get off. A white dress she had on. She was carrying a white parasol. I only saw her for one second. She didn't see me at all. But I'll bet a month hasn't gone by since that I hadn't thought of that girl." We all have that girl in our memory. God help us, every one, we do.
4. Rollo Tomassi, L.A. Confidential. I've made no secret of my intense dislike of this film's (second) ending but even I can recognize the brilliantly versatile usage of the never-seen Rollo Tomassi. He is goody two shoes Ed Exley's beacon and his name provides pompous Jack Vincennes his glorious valediction and he becomes the chief villain's unwitting downfall.
3. Dimitri Kisoff, Dr. Strangelove. As the Soviet premiere who receives a late-night phone call from U.S. President Muffley (Peter Sellers) as nuclear holocaust beckons, the mere thought of what he's doing and what he's wearing (a smoking jacket, of course) while he's on the other end of the line - "Listen, I can't hear too well, do you suppose you could turn the music down just a little?" - never fails to have me in stitches.
2. Tony Rocky Horror, Pulp Fiction. It's not merely the impeccable Tarantino-esque moniker that makes the half-black, half-Samoan with a weight problem so memorable but his exquisite implementation. He's the dude that gives Mia Wallace the forbidden foot massage that apparently gets him tossed out a window by Mr. Mia Wallace. He's the character in the classically relayed tale that goes a long way in establishing Ms. Wallace as a retro chic Harry Lime.
1. Owen Taylor / Sean Regan, The Big Sleep. The former is General Sternwood's chauffeur. The latter is General Sternwood's personal Joe Friday, the guy who drinks the brandy General Sternwood can no longer drink. Sean Regan has vanished before the movie even begins. Owen Taylor's car gets run off a pier. This disappearance and this death ostensibly drive the film but no one knows what actually happened to them. Raymond Chandler wrote the freaking story and he didn't know what happened to them. But thank God that whatever happened to them happened to them because if it hadn't then Phillip Marlowe never would have met Vivian Sternwood Rutledge and if Phillip Marlowe hadn't met Vivian Sternwood Rutledge then we would have all been denied cinema at its most purely beauteous. Owen Taylor and Sean Regan - the true expendables.
10 Best Movie Characters You Never See
10. Rebecca, Rebecca. Any list about not seen characters has to begin with Hitchcock's Rebecca. And so that's what we're doing. And if you're not happy with her only checking in at #10, well, my apologies, but here at Cinema Romantico even the immaculate likes of Rebecca are no match for........
9. Penny Benjamin, Top Gun. "You've lost your qualifications as section leader three times, put in hack twice by me, with a history of high-speed passes over five air control towers and one admiral's daughter!" "Penny Benjamin?"
8. Dixie Wells, From Here To Eternity. The boxer whom Montgomery Clift's soulful Pvt. Robert E. Lee Prewitt accidentally blinded, causing him to put away his fighting gloves, the invisible pugilistic penitence he carries with him everywhere.
7. Katie Dunn, Million Dollar Baby. I could begin any treatise on any scene in Eastwood's magnum opus with the phrase "Few scenes in any movie move me as much as......" but nevertheless.....few scenes in any movie move me as much as the scene in "Million Dollar Baby" when Frankie, in a moment of genuinely melancholy reflection, exits the church to hear the Father ask "Did you write your daughter?" and Frankie simply responds "Every day." (Nick collapses into sobs.)
6. Jessup Dolly, Winter's Bone. The father of Ree Dolly and the meth-cooking fuel for her Ozarkian re-write of the Hero's Journey.
5. The Girl With The White Parasol, Citizen Kane. Everyone focuses on Rosebud when what has always most moved me to the depths of my being is Kane's manager, Bernstein (Everett Sloane), offering the following monologue as his own rumination Rosebud's meaning. "A fellow will remember a lot of things you wouldn't think he'd remember. You take me. One day, back in 1896, I was crossing over to Jersey on the ferry. And as we pulled out, there was another ferry pulling in. And on it there was a girl waiting to get off. A white dress she had on. She was carrying a white parasol. I only saw her for one second. She didn't see me at all. But I'll bet a month hasn't gone by since that I hadn't thought of that girl." We all have that girl in our memory. God help us, every one, we do.
4. Rollo Tomassi, L.A. Confidential. I've made no secret of my intense dislike of this film's (second) ending but even I can recognize the brilliantly versatile usage of the never-seen Rollo Tomassi. He is goody two shoes Ed Exley's beacon and his name provides pompous Jack Vincennes his glorious valediction and he becomes the chief villain's unwitting downfall.
3. Dimitri Kisoff, Dr. Strangelove. As the Soviet premiere who receives a late-night phone call from U.S. President Muffley (Peter Sellers) as nuclear holocaust beckons, the mere thought of what he's doing and what he's wearing (a smoking jacket, of course) while he's on the other end of the line - "Listen, I can't hear too well, do you suppose you could turn the music down just a little?" - never fails to have me in stitches.
2. Tony Rocky Horror, Pulp Fiction. It's not merely the impeccable Tarantino-esque moniker that makes the half-black, half-Samoan with a weight problem so memorable but his exquisite implementation. He's the dude that gives Mia Wallace the forbidden foot massage that apparently gets him tossed out a window by Mr. Mia Wallace. He's the character in the classically relayed tale that goes a long way in establishing Ms. Wallace as a retro chic Harry Lime.
1. Owen Taylor / Sean Regan, The Big Sleep. The former is General Sternwood's chauffeur. The latter is General Sternwood's personal Joe Friday, the guy who drinks the brandy General Sternwood can no longer drink. Sean Regan has vanished before the movie even begins. Owen Taylor's car gets run off a pier. This disappearance and this death ostensibly drive the film but no one knows what actually happened to them. Raymond Chandler wrote the freaking story and he didn't know what happened to them. But thank God that whatever happened to them happened to them because if it hadn't then Phillip Marlowe never would have met Vivian Sternwood Rutledge and if Phillip Marlowe hadn't met Vivian Sternwood Rutledge then we would have all been denied cinema at its most purely beauteous. Owen Taylor and Sean Regan - the true expendables.
Labels:
Lists
Monday, September 08, 2014
Realism & Romance and Ain't Them Bodies Saints
Bob Muldoon (Casey Affleck) has just broken out of prison and made the perilous journey home to Meridian, Texas. There he hides out with his pal Sweetie (Nate Parker). It’s late at night, they crack a couple cold ones and sit down at a dusty wooden table.
Sweetie: "So how'd you do it?"
Bob: "What, get out? I just started walking. Like I said I would."
Sweetie: "You just walked out?"
Bob: "Yup."
Sweetie: "How does that work?"
Bob: "Well, you know the guards come by your cell every night. They'd say 'lights out' and rattle bars with their sticks. This one guard, he always used to joke and carry on with us. And one night I said, 'Well, I won't be seeing you much longer. Figure I'll be outta here in about ten days.' He said, 'How you gonna do it?' I said, 'I'll just walk right out the door.' He said they'd stop me. I said, 'No, sir. I've got better things to do.' He said, 'That's not how it works.' I said, 'It only works that way because you think it has to. See, I've got a higher calling. I've got a wife and a little girl who needs her daddy.' Then he asked what did I know about a higher calling. He said I'd have to answer to God and the devil for the things I done. I tell him, 'Sir, I used to the devil. And now I'm just a man. As the days tick by, ten, nine, eight, and on the last day, the bars open up, and I'm gonna walk right out.'"
Pause.
Sweetie: "They said you jumped off a work truck."
Bob: "Yeah. Well."
Even without seeing the film, the intent of this particular exchange is likely clear – Bob reciting a tall tale and the curiously named Sweetie quickly calling it as the tall tale it is. And within this sequence, the entire ethos of “Ain’t Them Bodies Saints” is brought to the forefront, a clashing of ideals in the slow sweaty night. “Ain’t Them Bodies Saints” opens with a title card that simply avows “This Was In Texas.” When in Texas? We don’t really know, the film never explicitly says. Reviews, like Andrew O’Hehir’s, cite the mid-70’s, and while I suppose technology and costuming line up with this assertion, the technical setting seems more like an aesthetic choice. As O’Hehir also notes, the film is very much meant to evoke Terrence Malick’s “Badlands”, and “Badlands” was very much meant to evoke the Starkweather/Fugate murders of the late 50’s, and so even if “Ain’t Them Bodies Saints” is set in the 70’s, it sorta feels more like the 50’s. Yet, at the same time, it feels like a movie that’s seen “Badlands.” There is undoubtedly a certain cinematic style it strives to emulate, and because we can feel this emulation, we can also feel the film’s modernity.
Consider the song that plays over the above exchange. It comes across soulfully old school, like one of those uber-deep cuts you’d find on a compilations record. I could hardly fathom I’d never heard it, and after the film I went searching for it. Lo and behold, it’s a modern-day track, sung by an Andrew Tinker with whom I am entirely unfamiliar, near as I can tell recorded strictly for the film. In other words, “Ain’t Them Bodies Saints” is both classical and modern, and it blurs those lines repeatedly, taking a tall tale - as old as Odysseus striking for Ithaca, as new as Nicole Kidman waiting on Cold Mountain - and undercutting it with doses of sensibility. Nowhere is this more evident than in the character of Ruth (Rooney Mara), a wife to Bob but a mother to her child. She feels love for Bob and the hope that he will come and spirit them away, and that is the mark of a romantic. She feels love for her daughter and knows that a fugitive, even if it’s the father, entering her daughter’s life would only invite trouble, and that is the mark of a realist. And the film is pitched in the no-man’s-land between these ideals, in the rumbling, the push and pull of Ruth’s soul. And I suppose this is why the film so strongly appeals to me - because I am a romantic constantly feeling the pull of reality.
Skerritt (Keith Carradine) is a local shopowner who took in Bob and Ruth and basically raised them. He wants to protect Ruth by keeping Bob away, even if he seems to know full well that no matter how much he tries to keep Bob away, he can’t necessarily ensure Ruth’s protection. (A push/pull of its own.) He hires a gang of three to deal with Bob and they show up at his shop. One of them ogles an old-time pistol and wonders what the placard next to it is all about. Skerritt explains it’s a list of all the men who have met their end at the barrel of that pistol. “Sounds like bullshit to me,” the guy says. “Yeah,” Skerritt says, “it probably is.” But you can’t tell he doesn’t really believe it’s bullshit. I don’t really believe it’s bullshit either.
Sweetie: "So how'd you do it?"
Bob: "What, get out? I just started walking. Like I said I would."
Sweetie: "You just walked out?"
Bob: "Yup."
Sweetie: "How does that work?"
Bob: "Well, you know the guards come by your cell every night. They'd say 'lights out' and rattle bars with their sticks. This one guard, he always used to joke and carry on with us. And one night I said, 'Well, I won't be seeing you much longer. Figure I'll be outta here in about ten days.' He said, 'How you gonna do it?' I said, 'I'll just walk right out the door.' He said they'd stop me. I said, 'No, sir. I've got better things to do.' He said, 'That's not how it works.' I said, 'It only works that way because you think it has to. See, I've got a higher calling. I've got a wife and a little girl who needs her daddy.' Then he asked what did I know about a higher calling. He said I'd have to answer to God and the devil for the things I done. I tell him, 'Sir, I used to the devil. And now I'm just a man. As the days tick by, ten, nine, eight, and on the last day, the bars open up, and I'm gonna walk right out.'"
Pause.
Sweetie: "They said you jumped off a work truck."
Bob: "Yeah. Well."
Even without seeing the film, the intent of this particular exchange is likely clear – Bob reciting a tall tale and the curiously named Sweetie quickly calling it as the tall tale it is. And within this sequence, the entire ethos of “Ain’t Them Bodies Saints” is brought to the forefront, a clashing of ideals in the slow sweaty night. “Ain’t Them Bodies Saints” opens with a title card that simply avows “This Was In Texas.” When in Texas? We don’t really know, the film never explicitly says. Reviews, like Andrew O’Hehir’s, cite the mid-70’s, and while I suppose technology and costuming line up with this assertion, the technical setting seems more like an aesthetic choice. As O’Hehir also notes, the film is very much meant to evoke Terrence Malick’s “Badlands”, and “Badlands” was very much meant to evoke the Starkweather/Fugate murders of the late 50’s, and so even if “Ain’t Them Bodies Saints” is set in the 70’s, it sorta feels more like the 50’s. Yet, at the same time, it feels like a movie that’s seen “Badlands.” There is undoubtedly a certain cinematic style it strives to emulate, and because we can feel this emulation, we can also feel the film’s modernity.
Consider the song that plays over the above exchange. It comes across soulfully old school, like one of those uber-deep cuts you’d find on a compilations record. I could hardly fathom I’d never heard it, and after the film I went searching for it. Lo and behold, it’s a modern-day track, sung by an Andrew Tinker with whom I am entirely unfamiliar, near as I can tell recorded strictly for the film. In other words, “Ain’t Them Bodies Saints” is both classical and modern, and it blurs those lines repeatedly, taking a tall tale - as old as Odysseus striking for Ithaca, as new as Nicole Kidman waiting on Cold Mountain - and undercutting it with doses of sensibility. Nowhere is this more evident than in the character of Ruth (Rooney Mara), a wife to Bob but a mother to her child. She feels love for Bob and the hope that he will come and spirit them away, and that is the mark of a romantic. She feels love for her daughter and knows that a fugitive, even if it’s the father, entering her daughter’s life would only invite trouble, and that is the mark of a realist. And the film is pitched in the no-man’s-land between these ideals, in the rumbling, the push and pull of Ruth’s soul. And I suppose this is why the film so strongly appeals to me - because I am a romantic constantly feeling the pull of reality.
Skerritt (Keith Carradine) is a local shopowner who took in Bob and Ruth and basically raised them. He wants to protect Ruth by keeping Bob away, even if he seems to know full well that no matter how much he tries to keep Bob away, he can’t necessarily ensure Ruth’s protection. (A push/pull of its own.) He hires a gang of three to deal with Bob and they show up at his shop. One of them ogles an old-time pistol and wonders what the placard next to it is all about. Skerritt explains it’s a list of all the men who have met their end at the barrel of that pistol. “Sounds like bullshit to me,” the guy says. “Yeah,” Skerritt says, “it probably is.” But you can’t tell he doesn’t really believe it’s bullshit. I don’t really believe it’s bullshit either.
Sunday, September 07, 2014
Anything Goes!
Since Thursday of last week and up through Sunday, TIFF - that is, the Toronto International Film Festival - has been in the midst of bestowing endless cinematic gifts upon ardent filmgoers and heavy-hitting film critics and distribution seekers, etc. And with TIFF in full swing, no one, of course, is reading Cinema Romantico this week. Which is fine because it means I can do anything I want. Like post this......
That's right! It's the first-annual Anything Goes! week here at Cinema Romantico! Maybe I'll just post Jean Harlow clips. Maybe I'll just post Elisabeth Shue In "Cocktail" GIFs. Maybe I'll just talk all week about peripheral characters in "Elizabethtown." Maybe I'll offer in five-parts my spec script for a "Rizzoli & Isles" British spin-off starring Sienna Miller and Kate Middleton. Maybe I'll finally show the world that piece of fan fiction I wrote about Sundown. Maybe I'll provide comprehensive coverage of the 2014 Banker's Trust Whack-Bat Championships. Who knows?! I could do anything! Because ANYTHING GOES!!!!!!!!
I'd tell you to stick around and see what goes. But then, you're not reading.
That's right! It's the first-annual Anything Goes! week here at Cinema Romantico! Maybe I'll just post Jean Harlow clips. Maybe I'll just post Elisabeth Shue In "Cocktail" GIFs. Maybe I'll just talk all week about peripheral characters in "Elizabethtown." Maybe I'll offer in five-parts my spec script for a "Rizzoli & Isles" British spin-off starring Sienna Miller and Kate Middleton. Maybe I'll finally show the world that piece of fan fiction I wrote about Sundown. Maybe I'll provide comprehensive coverage of the 2014 Banker's Trust Whack-Bat Championships. Who knows?! I could do anything! Because ANYTHING GOES!!!!!!!!
I'd tell you to stick around and see what goes. But then, you're not reading.
Labels:
Anything Goes!
Friday, September 05, 2014
Friday's Old Fashioned: College (1927)
Buster Keaton,” the late great Roger Ebert once observed, “played a brave spirit who took the universe on its own terms, and gave no quarter.” Well, ain’t that the truth, on screen and off of it. Consider “The General”, his vaunted steam engine, Civil War-era masterpiece hailed by the infamous Sight and Sound Poll in 2012 as the 34th greatest film of all time. Of course, in its day – that is, 1926 – “The General” was met with stone-faced indifference befitting its auteur and leading man. Most men would have moped, and perhaps Keaton (rightfully, respectfully) did, but he also anted up and took the universe on its own terms, refusing to give quarter, and cranked out another film. It was “College”, not only his first film post-“General” but his lead-up to “Steamboat Bill Jr.”, my favorite Keaton film, and if you get situated between those two it is inevitable that your legacy might not be as far-reaching.
Much like “The General” and “Steamboat Bill Jr.” focused on Keaton’s proving his worth to the woman he loves, “College” finds him driven by wanting to prove his worth to Mary Haynes (Anne Cornwall). As Ronald, high school valedictorian (which means Keaton, thirty-two at the time of the film’s release, is playing a high school senior but let’s go right ahead and forgive him this sin), he gives a graduation speech centered around academics being superior to athletics, explicitly titled "The Curse of the Athlete."
Of course, it’s an athletic-centric society, and when Mary hears this, she rejects Ronald. After all, who prefers the academically inclined letter jacket to the athletically obtained one? And so even if “College’s”basis is in romance, it still packs the cannon with some gunpowder, launching broadsides at an institution that can be nigh impossible to afford and often provides greater rewards to the un-educationally inclined in spite of its stance as a place of so-called higher learning.
You’d of thought Ronald’s obviously outstanding grades would make him a cinch for a scholarship at local Clayton College but alas, ‘tis not to be. No, that free ride goes to Jeff (Harold Goodwin), Ronald’s rival for Mary’s affection and a first-class sportsman. Thus, Ronald decides to work his way through college (which includes a somewhat unfortunate incident of Mr. Keaton in – oh God – blackface that is simply one of those most unfortunate incidents unavoidable in the era) and to learn to play them sports real, real good in an effort to win fair Mary’s heart. This might suggest that Mary’s heart is, in fact, a wee bit less than fair. She dislikes bookworms and fawns over sportsmen, but Keaton was always so staunchly single-minded in his tasks that when he’s smitten, he’s smitten. If Kate Upton was on campus and she professed to only have eyes for students of astronomy, every player on the football team would drop Rocks for Jocks and start looking at the stars, wouldn’t they? Wait, should Kate Upton become America’s Academic Coordinator? I’m getting distracted. Apologies.
Admittedly, this entire idea provides a convenient platform for Keaton, the physical comedian to end all physical comedians, a chance to be comically physical, and so he indulges in a varying gags as he tries baseball and running and jumping and throwing. Some might seem obvious, like his woeful attempt at hurdling in which he manages to knock over every hurdle but one. Yet consider the dexterity in knocking over every hurdle but one in precisely the same way and then the perfect actorly showmanship to finish, look back, register that every hurdle has been knocked over the but the last one and then knock over the last one anyway with a “might-as-well” slumping of the shoulders. It’s like the universe – his dastardly old enemy – failed to provide the proper punchline and so Keaton just goes ahead and provides it of his own accord. That’s a level of defeatism to be respected.
Of course, in reality, Keaton was extraordinarily athletic, as evidenced by every freaking stunt he so adroitly pulls off while pretending to be woefully un-athletic, and so eventually he will strut his stuff. This occurs in the third act climax made Ronald makes the requisite run to save the woman he loves from the clutches of the villain, sprinting across campus, hurdling bushes and pole vaulting through Mary’s window in a spectacular stunt that apparently Keaton had to pass off to someone else but still. It is a hero’s end, yet a satirical undercurrent pervades, what when considering that Ronald does not win his true love until he channels his inner-sportsman and that once he channels his inner-athlete and wins his true love, they drop out of college to get married.
He's fallen victim to The Curse of the Athlete.
Much like “The General” and “Steamboat Bill Jr.” focused on Keaton’s proving his worth to the woman he loves, “College” finds him driven by wanting to prove his worth to Mary Haynes (Anne Cornwall). As Ronald, high school valedictorian (which means Keaton, thirty-two at the time of the film’s release, is playing a high school senior but let’s go right ahead and forgive him this sin), he gives a graduation speech centered around academics being superior to athletics, explicitly titled "The Curse of the Athlete."
Of course, it’s an athletic-centric society, and when Mary hears this, she rejects Ronald. After all, who prefers the academically inclined letter jacket to the athletically obtained one? And so even if “College’s”basis is in romance, it still packs the cannon with some gunpowder, launching broadsides at an institution that can be nigh impossible to afford and often provides greater rewards to the un-educationally inclined in spite of its stance as a place of so-called higher learning.
You’d of thought Ronald’s obviously outstanding grades would make him a cinch for a scholarship at local Clayton College but alas, ‘tis not to be. No, that free ride goes to Jeff (Harold Goodwin), Ronald’s rival for Mary’s affection and a first-class sportsman. Thus, Ronald decides to work his way through college (which includes a somewhat unfortunate incident of Mr. Keaton in – oh God – blackface that is simply one of those most unfortunate incidents unavoidable in the era) and to learn to play them sports real, real good in an effort to win fair Mary’s heart. This might suggest that Mary’s heart is, in fact, a wee bit less than fair. She dislikes bookworms and fawns over sportsmen, but Keaton was always so staunchly single-minded in his tasks that when he’s smitten, he’s smitten. If Kate Upton was on campus and she professed to only have eyes for students of astronomy, every player on the football team would drop Rocks for Jocks and start looking at the stars, wouldn’t they? Wait, should Kate Upton become America’s Academic Coordinator? I’m getting distracted. Apologies.
Admittedly, this entire idea provides a convenient platform for Keaton, the physical comedian to end all physical comedians, a chance to be comically physical, and so he indulges in a varying gags as he tries baseball and running and jumping and throwing. Some might seem obvious, like his woeful attempt at hurdling in which he manages to knock over every hurdle but one. Yet consider the dexterity in knocking over every hurdle but one in precisely the same way and then the perfect actorly showmanship to finish, look back, register that every hurdle has been knocked over the but the last one and then knock over the last one anyway with a “might-as-well” slumping of the shoulders. It’s like the universe – his dastardly old enemy – failed to provide the proper punchline and so Keaton just goes ahead and provides it of his own accord. That’s a level of defeatism to be respected.
Of course, in reality, Keaton was extraordinarily athletic, as evidenced by every freaking stunt he so adroitly pulls off while pretending to be woefully un-athletic, and so eventually he will strut his stuff. This occurs in the third act climax made Ronald makes the requisite run to save the woman he loves from the clutches of the villain, sprinting across campus, hurdling bushes and pole vaulting through Mary’s window in a spectacular stunt that apparently Keaton had to pass off to someone else but still. It is a hero’s end, yet a satirical undercurrent pervades, what when considering that Ronald does not win his true love until he channels his inner-sportsman and that once he channels his inner-athlete and wins his true love, they drop out of college to get married.
He's fallen victim to The Curse of the Athlete.
Labels:
Buster Keaton,
College,
Friday's Old Fashioned
Thursday, September 04, 2014
The Greatest Walk of Shame (That Isn't Really A Walk of Shame)
A negative connotation surrounds the cultural phrase Walk of Shame. As Urban Dictionary defines it via its always eloquent prose, a walk of shame is "when you leave someone's house with the same clothes you had on the night before." This walk is generally viewed through the prism of regret, like Ashley Judd's character in "Come Early Morning" always sliding out of bed post-one night stand and slinking away or Charlize Theron in "Young Adult" slinking out of her own bed and her own house and still slinking away. But what if a Walk of Shame isn't shameful? What if it's a Walk of Joy Mixed With Melancholy That Finds Triumph In Embarrassment? Ah, then you have the walk of "Elizabethtown's" one & only Claire Colburn, the original [redacted].
Let's break it down, shall we, frame by whimsical frame.
Here she strolls down the hall of The Brown Hotel with her head hung and her shoulders slumped. That is not shame, however, but sorrowful nostalgia for what has just passed. (Testify, sister.)
Elevator. Goin' down. Facing reality. Buck up. "I don't wanna buck up!!!!!!" BUCK UP!!!!!!
With a ding, the elevator doors open.
"Love that dress!" Cuz, you know, it's the dress Claire was, like, totally wearing the night before.
Chuck (of Chuck and Cindy, the to-be-married couple staying next door to Drew at the Brown Hotel, "Loving Life/Loving You") is in the hotel lobby at, what, ten in the morning, drinking a beer. Respect. (Also, until this screen shot, I never noticed the older lady in blue to the right. Even she's into this non-Walk of Shame.)
Just take the cheers and the guffaws and the "you go, girls!" and just go, girl.
Owning it. #FuckYeah
Let's break it down, shall we, frame by whimsical frame.
Well, this is the how the Walk of Shame begins - Claire memorializing it with one of her patented mental pictures. And so straight away we know that shame can't really be involved. She wants to remember it, hold onto it, not let it end.
She leaves a flower beside the ashes of Drew's father. Another sign of the non-shame of this Walk of Shame. I mean, that's just so......nice. (Slate Magazine, I believe, criticized the choice of flower, advising Claire that "she did it wrong", citing Lilies as the optimal choice.)
Here she strolls down the hall of The Brown Hotel with her head hung and her shoulders slumped. That is not shame, however, but sorrowful nostalgia for what has just passed. (Testify, sister.)
Love this shot. Love it, love it, love it. The way Kirsten poses, like she's trying to maintain a positivity in the face of sadness (and sorta failing), while the balloons chill in the bottom of the righthand side of the frame, gleeful taunts.
Elevator. Goin' down. Facing reality. Buck up. "I don't wanna buck up!!!!!!" BUCK UP!!!!!!
With a ding, the elevator doors open.
Hearing all manner of noises - like, say, a ginormous wedding party - in the lobby, Claire freaks the eff out.
"Love that dress!" Cuz, you know, it's the dress Claire was, like, totally wearing the night before.
Nobly, she assumes a smile of good humor and walks the walk. You got this, Claire. You got this!
Chuck (of Chuck and Cindy, the to-be-married couple staying next door to Drew at the Brown Hotel, "Loving Life/Loving You") is in the hotel lobby at, what, ten in the morning, drinking a beer. Respect. (Also, until this screen shot, I never noticed the older lady in blue to the right. Even she's into this non-Walk of Shame.)
Just take the cheers and the guffaws and the "you go, girls!" and just go, girl.
Owning it. #FuckYeah
Labels:
Claire Colburn,
Elizabethtown,
Kirsten Dunst
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)