The 2014 batch of Oscar nominees for the Best Live Action short are far and away a stronger group as a whole than last year’s even if none of the quintet reaches the heights of the incredibly tenacious “Just Before Losing Everything.” That was a film resistant to the sentimentality that so often pervades this category, and while there are moments of mawkishness sprinkled throughout this year’s group, they also allow for at least a few drops of real world tonic. In the end, though, the category is defined by one film and one performance, so much so that Cinema Romantico wishes the Academy could tell “tradition” to go the way of the Academy Juvenile Award and give a Best Actress In A Live Action Short.
We’ll start, however, with “Boogaloo and Graham”, running in a swift fourteen minutes. It’s undoubtedly the most sentimental of the lot, attempting to offset that sentimentality at least a smidgen with its setting – 1978 Belfast in the midst of the troubles. The troubles, though, aren’t really the point, even though a death is haphazardly worked in to underscore Death as opposed to Life. Life is represented by the two baby chicks a father bestows upon his two sons who learn what it means to nurture and love. Their mother is sort of presented as the one to squash all the fun, telling boys to stop being boys, but there is an everyday exhaustion in the demeanor of Charlene McKenna playing the role that suggests more emotional complexity than the whole rest of the film.
Oded Binnun and Mihal Brezis’s “Aya” checks in at nearly 40 minutes despite being an old fashioned two-hander. It’s sort of like an alternate universe version of the “Seinfeld” episode where Jerry and George take the limo assigned to a mysterious “O’Brien.” Here, however, Aya (Sarah Adler), while waiting for someone at the airport assumes the role of a chauffeur for a Danish music instructor, Overby (Ulrich Thomsen), bound for Jerusalem. Even if their conversation involves specifics, it still feels mysterious, alternating between confusion and mystical connection. We never quite understand who the titular character is but then that seems the gradually emergent argument – a woman slipping out of her own life to try on another. And though the closing shot involves her smiling, it’s difficult to detect if that curl of the lips is for checking back into reality or wistfully reminiscing what just was.
“The Phone Call”, a swift-moving UK entry, involves Jim Broadbent in voiceover-only performance placing a, uh, phone call to a crisis center which is answered by Sally Hawkins who offers companionship as she struggles to make precise sense of his situation. His reason for dialing, as you might surmise, is less than good, but while another actor might have played more toward the drama of eliciting his obligatory revelation, Hawkins hones in on the reassurance, mollifying him as much as trying to save him. The crisis draws you in, sure, but so does Hawkins, and she does amidst a series of fairly basic shots that don't emotionally cheat. She draws you in and holds you. And while the film appears headed for a heartbreaking denouement, its coda actually arrives about thirty seconds later, thirty seconds which are comprised of Hawkins wielding her nervous energy to marvelously effect someone who has tip-toed through an emotional minefield and wound up as a brightly lit human being in the black and white landscape of Springsteen's "Reason to Believe."
A less successful tale of unlikely friendship is “Parvaneh.” It’s not that it’s unsuccessful, per se, but it’s just sort of utilitarian, sweet if unchallenging and unenlightening. Young Afghani Parvaneh (Nissa Kashani) lives and works in a Swiss refugee center, keeping to herself, trying to earn some scratch to send back home. When she does, she attempts to send it by Western Union, and when she is denied, she finds herself thrust into a tentative relationship with another teen girl, Emely (Cheryl Count). The latter is predictably introduced as potentially being less-than-generous only to slowly reveal a genuine beating heart beneath her punkish exterior as we are reminded it’s a small world after all. It’s harmless, I suppose, but a more interesting story seemed buried up in the mountains of Parvaneh’s refugee center, one of a migrant’s isolation that seemed even more worthy of telling.
In Tibetan culture the Butter Lamp is a symbol of awakened wisdom, and true to meaning Hu Wei’s French-Chinese film “Butter Lamp” is thirteen leisurely if masterful minutes of wisdom slowly awakened. It documents the professional repetitions of a Chinese photographer in a small Tibetan village as he photographs people sitting or standing or kneeling before a series of fake backdrops – The Great Wall, Disneyland, the Potala Palace. The camera is unmoving, pointedly never getting anywhere, a stationary perspective, aesthetically and emotionally. Perhaps the final shot reveal is one “you can see coming” but it blunts none of the quiet magnitude of the moment, one that made me think of the time I was on Hawaii’s Big Island and a couple in floral print shirts asked if I could take their picture in front of the cruise ship from which they just disembarked. “The cruise ship?” I thought to myself. “The whole Pacific Ocean is out there and you want your photo taken in front of the Carnival freaking Breeze? LOOK WHERE YOU ARE!”
So give “Butter Lamp” the Oscar, I say, while remembering to take a moment and revel in the righteousness of Sally Hawkins.
Showing posts with label Oscar Live Action Short Nominees. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Oscar Live Action Short Nominees. Show all posts
Monday, February 09, 2015
Tuesday, February 04, 2014
Just Before Losing Everything: The Only Oscar Live Action Short That Matters
Like every year, I planned to watch the five Oscar nominees for the Best Live Action Short Film and then review each one before providing my entirely subjective, wholly unimportant endorsement. But, occasionally plans and circumstances are modified.
Finland's "Do I Have To Take Care Of Everything?" is a perfectly acceptable little trifle, seven minutes of easygoing Finnish niceness that underscores how families need to care of everything together. "Helium" is a bit like "Finding Neverland", just without Kate Winslet and the watered-down portrait of J.M. Barrie. "This Wasn't Me", and pardon me for saying so, is mostly hogwash, tracking doctors in a nameless worn torn country who are taken hostage. It has an interesting idea in there, children handed machine guns who are so brainwashed they don't understand the circular illogic of a civil war. But that idea is forsaken so that a foreigner can save the day and we can all feel good about ourselves.
"The Voorman Problem", I'm guessing, will actually win the Oscar, and it's probably going to win the Oscar because it's packing Star Power. Which is to say, it features Martin Freeman and Tom Hollander, the latter as a man claiming to be an all-powerful god and the former as the psychiatrist tasked to evaluate him. And it's solid enough, managing to be everything in 13 minutes that "Bruce Almighty" couldn't be in 101 of them.
But ultimately the 2013 Live Action Short category is akin to the 1973 Belmont Stakes, the third leg of the so-called Triple Crown horse race in which a mere four thoroughbreds so inconsequential no one figured they had a real chance and whose names no one remembers were thoroughly and astonishingly demolished by the legendary Secretariat.
France's "Avant Que De Tout Perdre (Just Before Losing Everything)" is Secretariat and its four challengers are what's-their-names?
I appreciate films choosing to airdrop us into the midst of an ongoing, fully-formed situation, and then refraining from convenient dollops of exposition to provide bearings, trusting the filmmaking and acting and editing to organically do that for us. Xavier Legrand's "Just Before Losing Everything" is such a film, and a sensational one.
Miriam (Léa Drucker, and if the Best Live Action Short category had Best Actor/Actress, she would win) picks up her young son Julien (Miljan Chatelain). We sense urgency, but to what point and purpose? Miriam then picks up her teenage daughter Josephine (Mathilde Auneveux) at a bus stop. She kisses her boyfriend goodbye. For a moment we sense the old cinematic dynamic - Boyfriend Parent Does Not Want Daughter To Have. Except.....when Josephine climbs in the van, her boyfriend lingers at the window. Miriam is hardly upset. Hmmmmmm.
They press on and to the supermarket where Miriam is employed. Her co-workers appear helpful but panicked. What is going on? Eventually, delicately, compellingly, perfectly, it is revealed that Miriam and her children are hoping to flee Miriam's abusive husband. This plot detail does not, refreshingly, come to light through a single misplaced line, or some such, but rather via basic of details all piled on top of one another that dramatically allow the audience to form a working knowledge of what is taking place all on its own.
I hesitate to give away much more, but even the most rudimentary familiarity should not taint your experience, specifically because how the film is made is everything. It's a little Greengrass-y, as in it's very much a docudrama, but the camerawork and editing are much clearer and the music does not swell and the auteurism never outweighs the people in the frame. Stakes. All I ever hear about from critics are "stakes." You want stakes, critics? These are f***ing stakes. The film is so suspenseful I sweat through my shirt and my overwhelming urge to pee (because I foolishly bought a cup of coffee for the showing) vanished because I became so involved.
The ending is open, as it should be, because, like Jesse Wallace talking to the journalists in the Shakespeare & Co. Bookstore in the same city, "It's a good test, right, if you're a romantic or a cynic." You think they got away. You think they didn't get away for sure. You hope they got away, but you don't know.
Whether or not a film earns an Oscar bears no relationship to its true merit, of course. Yet, this is Xavier Legrand's first film, short or feature, and I was so taken with it that I am already desperate to see what he may do next. I can only imagine that earning an Oscar will open all sorts of doors for him to do all manner of projects. Therefore I say with all the passion I can muster...for the love of God, give "Just Before Losing Everything" the Oscar.
Finland's "Do I Have To Take Care Of Everything?" is a perfectly acceptable little trifle, seven minutes of easygoing Finnish niceness that underscores how families need to care of everything together. "Helium" is a bit like "Finding Neverland", just without Kate Winslet and the watered-down portrait of J.M. Barrie. "This Wasn't Me", and pardon me for saying so, is mostly hogwash, tracking doctors in a nameless worn torn country who are taken hostage. It has an interesting idea in there, children handed machine guns who are so brainwashed they don't understand the circular illogic of a civil war. But that idea is forsaken so that a foreigner can save the day and we can all feel good about ourselves.
"The Voorman Problem", I'm guessing, will actually win the Oscar, and it's probably going to win the Oscar because it's packing Star Power. Which is to say, it features Martin Freeman and Tom Hollander, the latter as a man claiming to be an all-powerful god and the former as the psychiatrist tasked to evaluate him. And it's solid enough, managing to be everything in 13 minutes that "Bruce Almighty" couldn't be in 101 of them.
But ultimately the 2013 Live Action Short category is akin to the 1973 Belmont Stakes, the third leg of the so-called Triple Crown horse race in which a mere four thoroughbreds so inconsequential no one figured they had a real chance and whose names no one remembers were thoroughly and astonishingly demolished by the legendary Secretariat.
France's "Avant Que De Tout Perdre (Just Before Losing Everything)" is Secretariat and its four challengers are what's-their-names?
I appreciate films choosing to airdrop us into the midst of an ongoing, fully-formed situation, and then refraining from convenient dollops of exposition to provide bearings, trusting the filmmaking and acting and editing to organically do that for us. Xavier Legrand's "Just Before Losing Everything" is such a film, and a sensational one.
Miriam (Léa Drucker, and if the Best Live Action Short category had Best Actor/Actress, she would win) picks up her young son Julien (Miljan Chatelain). We sense urgency, but to what point and purpose? Miriam then picks up her teenage daughter Josephine (Mathilde Auneveux) at a bus stop. She kisses her boyfriend goodbye. For a moment we sense the old cinematic dynamic - Boyfriend Parent Does Not Want Daughter To Have. Except.....when Josephine climbs in the van, her boyfriend lingers at the window. Miriam is hardly upset. Hmmmmmm.
They press on and to the supermarket where Miriam is employed. Her co-workers appear helpful but panicked. What is going on? Eventually, delicately, compellingly, perfectly, it is revealed that Miriam and her children are hoping to flee Miriam's abusive husband. This plot detail does not, refreshingly, come to light through a single misplaced line, or some such, but rather via basic of details all piled on top of one another that dramatically allow the audience to form a working knowledge of what is taking place all on its own.
I hesitate to give away much more, but even the most rudimentary familiarity should not taint your experience, specifically because how the film is made is everything. It's a little Greengrass-y, as in it's very much a docudrama, but the camerawork and editing are much clearer and the music does not swell and the auteurism never outweighs the people in the frame. Stakes. All I ever hear about from critics are "stakes." You want stakes, critics? These are f***ing stakes. The film is so suspenseful I sweat through my shirt and my overwhelming urge to pee (because I foolishly bought a cup of coffee for the showing) vanished because I became so involved.
The ending is open, as it should be, because, like Jesse Wallace talking to the journalists in the Shakespeare & Co. Bookstore in the same city, "It's a good test, right, if you're a romantic or a cynic." You think they got away. You think they didn't get away for sure. You hope they got away, but you don't know.
Whether or not a film earns an Oscar bears no relationship to its true merit, of course. Yet, this is Xavier Legrand's first film, short or feature, and I was so taken with it that I am already desperate to see what he may do next. I can only imagine that earning an Oscar will open all sorts of doors for him to do all manner of projects. Therefore I say with all the passion I can muster...for the love of God, give "Just Before Losing Everything" the Oscar.
Tuesday, February 12, 2013
Oscar Live Action Short Nominees
Currently the five Academy Award nominees for Live Action Shorts are screening at the Landmark Century Cinema in Chicago. These are brief reviews of each film followed by my “all important” endorsement for which one should take home the Oscar.
Asad (South Africa/United States) directed by Bryan Buckley. In a sentence: a 13 year old Somali boy named Asad is torn between the life of a fishing rowboat and a piracy motorboat. But that sentence is an injustice. Buckley's film is in the details, the way a band of youthful Somali pirates speeding off to hijack a luxury yacht is presented no differently than a New Yorker catching the G-train for work and the way walking in the street can suddenly and frighteningly flip on a dime to genuine terror. Yet, for all the hard knocks, this film is buoyant in spirit, feinting in one direction at the end before reversing course and going another. It's an odd resolution but also oddly perfect. Hope sustains.
Buzkashi Boys (Afghanistan) directed by Sam French. Gorging visually on the spectacular mountain imagery of Kabul, the longest of the five nominees (half-an-hour) is yet another variation on the age-old theme of dreaming the impossible dream. Young Rafi (Fawad Mohammadi) is fated to become a blacksmith like his father and his father before him and his father, etc. Rafi's homeless pal Ahmad (Jawanmard Paiz), on the other hand, harbors big dreams of being a Buzkashi rider - sort of an Afgahni twist on polo - and he presses Rafi to, you know, be whatever he wants to be. It's well-intentioned, sure, but over-executed, relying on a grandiloquent piece of plotting that doesn't feel earned, reducing one of its characters to a martyr rather than letting its primary Buzkashi Boy figure things out for himself.
Curfew (United States) directed by Shawn Christensen. Imagine if the Scoot McNairy misanthropic slacker of "In Search Of A Kiss Goodnight" teamed up with acts-older-than-she-is Summer Hathaway (Miranda Cosgrove) of "School of Rock" for a mini misadventure through the mean streets of NYC. In the midst of slitting his wrists, Richie (Christensen) is called upon by his in-dire-straits sister (Kim Allen) to babysit his niece, the precocious if ball-busting Sophia (Fatima Ptacek). This is a short that seems to have been based more on images - like a is-this-really-happening? bowling alley dance sequence that I suppose looks pretty - and ideas - like Richie screaming at two club-hopping gossips - than on evincing Sophia's ultimate, inevitable turn-around regarding her uncle. That it works is a testament to the fiercely honest Ptacek who delivers the finest performance of the nominated quintet. She is to Brooklyn what Hushpuppy was to the Bathtub.
Death of a Shadow (Belgium) directed by Tom Van Avermaet. The most visually innovative and narratively original of the lot, it also does a fine job parceling out information, hooking us initially on creepy imagery and a jittery performance from Matthias Schoenaerts as WWI soldier Nathan Rijckx. Eventually it is revealed, without revealing the entire gist of it, that this is the afterlife and Nathan is attempting to rejoin with the real world and his beloved Sarah (Laura Verlinden) by photographing the shadows of dead people. Tragedy inevitably awaits but the film is almost more focused on its look and its peculiarities than its emotional wallop. It's, well, a shadow of sacrificial love.
Henry (Canada) directed by Yan England. When my mom's mother, my last grandparent to pass away, was slowly fading away a couple years ago, she could, in the course of a single conversation, remember me, forget me, and remember me again. And my mom told me stories of her advising her caretakers over and over that she planned to escape through her window and go back home to Chicago, a city she had not lived in for years and years. It was an admittedly disconcerting glimpse into dementia and "Henry" attempts to give us another glimpse, crossing "Amour" with "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind." We follow Henry as he struggles to follow his own thoughts, remembering, forgetting, jumping back and forth between present and past. It ends with a moment of brightness but it can't negate all the bleakness that came before.
And my "all important" endorsement goes to........."Asad." It didn't provide me the same level of joy as "Pentecost" did last year but its spirt and its window into Somalia left me quite satisfied.
Asad (South Africa/United States) directed by Bryan Buckley. In a sentence: a 13 year old Somali boy named Asad is torn between the life of a fishing rowboat and a piracy motorboat. But that sentence is an injustice. Buckley's film is in the details, the way a band of youthful Somali pirates speeding off to hijack a luxury yacht is presented no differently than a New Yorker catching the G-train for work and the way walking in the street can suddenly and frighteningly flip on a dime to genuine terror. Yet, for all the hard knocks, this film is buoyant in spirit, feinting in one direction at the end before reversing course and going another. It's an odd resolution but also oddly perfect. Hope sustains.
Buzkashi Boys (Afghanistan) directed by Sam French. Gorging visually on the spectacular mountain imagery of Kabul, the longest of the five nominees (half-an-hour) is yet another variation on the age-old theme of dreaming the impossible dream. Young Rafi (Fawad Mohammadi) is fated to become a blacksmith like his father and his father before him and his father, etc. Rafi's homeless pal Ahmad (Jawanmard Paiz), on the other hand, harbors big dreams of being a Buzkashi rider - sort of an Afgahni twist on polo - and he presses Rafi to, you know, be whatever he wants to be. It's well-intentioned, sure, but over-executed, relying on a grandiloquent piece of plotting that doesn't feel earned, reducing one of its characters to a martyr rather than letting its primary Buzkashi Boy figure things out for himself.
Curfew (United States) directed by Shawn Christensen. Imagine if the Scoot McNairy misanthropic slacker of "In Search Of A Kiss Goodnight" teamed up with acts-older-than-she-is Summer Hathaway (Miranda Cosgrove) of "School of Rock" for a mini misadventure through the mean streets of NYC. In the midst of slitting his wrists, Richie (Christensen) is called upon by his in-dire-straits sister (Kim Allen) to babysit his niece, the precocious if ball-busting Sophia (Fatima Ptacek). This is a short that seems to have been based more on images - like a is-this-really-happening? bowling alley dance sequence that I suppose looks pretty - and ideas - like Richie screaming at two club-hopping gossips - than on evincing Sophia's ultimate, inevitable turn-around regarding her uncle. That it works is a testament to the fiercely honest Ptacek who delivers the finest performance of the nominated quintet. She is to Brooklyn what Hushpuppy was to the Bathtub.
Death of a Shadow (Belgium) directed by Tom Van Avermaet. The most visually innovative and narratively original of the lot, it also does a fine job parceling out information, hooking us initially on creepy imagery and a jittery performance from Matthias Schoenaerts as WWI soldier Nathan Rijckx. Eventually it is revealed, without revealing the entire gist of it, that this is the afterlife and Nathan is attempting to rejoin with the real world and his beloved Sarah (Laura Verlinden) by photographing the shadows of dead people. Tragedy inevitably awaits but the film is almost more focused on its look and its peculiarities than its emotional wallop. It's, well, a shadow of sacrificial love.
Henry (Canada) directed by Yan England. When my mom's mother, my last grandparent to pass away, was slowly fading away a couple years ago, she could, in the course of a single conversation, remember me, forget me, and remember me again. And my mom told me stories of her advising her caretakers over and over that she planned to escape through her window and go back home to Chicago, a city she had not lived in for years and years. It was an admittedly disconcerting glimpse into dementia and "Henry" attempts to give us another glimpse, crossing "Amour" with "Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind." We follow Henry as he struggles to follow his own thoughts, remembering, forgetting, jumping back and forth between present and past. It ends with a moment of brightness but it can't negate all the bleakness that came before.
And my "all important" endorsement goes to........."Asad." It didn't provide me the same level of joy as "Pentecost" did last year but its spirt and its window into Somalia left me quite satisfied.
Labels:
Oscar Live Action Short Nominees
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)