' ' Cinema Romantico: Steve Martin
Showing posts with label Steve Martin. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Steve Martin. Show all posts

Sunday, March 02, 2014

Steve Martin and The Holy Trinity Of Comic Screenplays

When told he had been named recipient of an Honorary Oscar, Steve Martin observed that he had long since given up hope for an Academy Award seeing has how comedians do not win them, demonstrating how in any given situation the comedian is angling for the joke. An Honorary Oscar in Martin’s case, however, for a lifetime body of work as opposed to a statue for a singular performance seems apropos because it spotlights the quiet evolution of his career. At the same time, I find it more personally satisfying, because while best known as a performer before the camera, I have always valued him most as a writer, particularly for an astonishing trio screenplays spanning an eleven year period.


Steve Martin was born a poor black child. Wait, that’s not right. In fact, it’s a little obvious, and obviousness is not one of the hallmarks of Steve Martin’s career. His contribution to the movies may be massive, but he is also a novelist and a playwrite, an accomplished banjoist, an avid collector of art, and a first-time father at the unobvious age of 67. Even as a comedian he refused the “shamanistic high life of seventies comedy” because, as Rick Anderson wrote in New York Magazine, “he was relentlessly square.” And yet for being a relentless square, for wearing a suit onstage, for kinda, sorta apprenticing at Disney, he was edgy and inventive. He didn’t seek to perform comedy so much as perform – to quote his memoir “Born Standing Up” – “a parody of comedy.” His act was almost a critique of the comic persona as it was then known. To wit, it was his college courses in psychology, at both Long Beach State and UCLA, where he began formulating the ideas for his own act, analyzing the deeper meaning of the punchline rather than writing punchlines.

Martin was uninterested in automatic applause, a “distance” that Rick Anderson refers to, “an odd performative gap between himself and whatever he happens to be doing.” This is glimpsed not only in his stage comedy but in his earliest films, most of which I like, though perhaps do not outright love, such as the seminal “Jerk” and the Carl Reiner-helmed “The Man With Two Brains.” In these productions you can feel that distance throughout. The old Roger Ebert rule of comedy stipulates that a funny hat by itself is not funny, and that instead a man must not know he’s wearing a funny hat. In these films Martin does not know he’s wearing a funny hat exactly, but you can sense him having picked out the proper funny hat just before filming.


C.D. Bales in “Roxanne” doesn’t know his nose is funny. Well, he knows his nose is funny to others, it's just not funny to him. Written by Martin and based off the exalted Edmond Rostand play “Cyrano de Bergerac”, the 1987 Fred Schiepsi comedy, timeless even if the soundtrack and fashion are dated (aside from Daryl Hannah’s sleeveless jean jacket, which looks as chic now as it did then), “Roxanne” marked the first time Martin truly explored that distance he had cultivated between himself and his audience. The character knows his overlong schnoz automatically opens a social chasm between him and whomever else, and so he seeks to compensate.

This is most famously rendered in the sequence where he bets the name-calling jerk at the bar he can conjure up twenty better insults than “big nose”, and proceeds to do so. Each one is funny, absolutely, but the scene’s subtext makes clear the way he uses humor as a shield. That, and the way he uses performance, speaking for and writing letters for Rick Rossovich’s knucklehead Christian-stand-in who can barely converse with Roxanne without hyperventilating, to avoid expressing his true feelings.

Martin's script is ultimately intelligent enough to not only make Roxanne herself intelligent (she has her own life, so much so that she briefly exits the film to go live it) and to make his romantic rival an identifiable panicky goofball rather than a mean-spirited nemesis but to allow C.D. the opportunity to learn his self-worth rather than the heaven-sent astrophysicist teaching it to him. It also, I think, betrays Martin's inner-whimsy, forgoing the tragedy of Rostand's source material by allowing its characters to see the good in others and in themselves.


Although Martin had movies in between, his next screenplay was not until 1991, “L.A. Story”, and at first glance it might appear to harken back to his earlier sketch comedy ways. Martin said he worked on the screenplay for seven years and this is easy to sense – marvelous scenes are at a premium and the teeniest of gags are sprinkled throughout, as if written on a cocktail napkin at the last second. For such an array of side-splitting gags, however, the film has a noticeable and fascinating mystical component.

In the film, Martin plays Harris K. Telemacher, a weatherman in Los Angeles, an occupation which provides ammunition for all manner of jokes but also slyly suggests the ultimate existential crisis. His eventual aide-de-camp is quintessentially Angeleno - that is, a freeway sign, which magically pulls him over one night and presents life advice via glowing block lettering. This is his Call To Adventure, which he initially refuses, before finally accepting and, thus, Crossing the Threshold into a place that, frankly, is as much about New Age spiritualism (Enya peppers the soundtrack) as it is stellar comedy bits.

The script centers around Harris falling for a kooky Brit, Sara (Victoria Tennant, Martin's then-wife), but overall it's not a Love Story. It's an "L.A. Story", and ultimately the film plays like its creative force (though Mick Jackson was the director) is having a dialogue with both the city, resisting it and admiring it, and a higher power, the performer relinquishing his place center stage and letting the divine take him where it will.


That mysticism becomes even more interesting when considering "Bowfinger", a film which followed "L.A. Story" eight years later. There Martin is quite consciously taking shots at Scientology in the form of Mindhead, a vaguely defined new age religion to which fictional movie star Kit Ramsey adheres (played by Eddie Murphy, a man who has become rather unlikable but who becomes likable in dual roles through the conduit of Martin's writing). In fact, Martin is taking potshots at Hollywood as a whole, playing a wannabe movie director named Bobby K. Bowfinger. Here the performative gap is between the Industry and Bowfinger, him standing outside its gold-encrusted guarded walls and trying to claw his way inside. He eventually does, making a guerrilla big-budget movie with a low-budget and with Kit Ramsey as star even though Kit Ramsey doesn't know he's in it.

It's a satire, and a brilliant one, loaded with massive gags - the highway "stunt" sequence which has made me laugh, hard, every single time I have watched it - and small gags - at the end Bowfinger is hired to direct a film in Taiwan "starring Kit Ramsey's brother", a witty nod to it all being about who you know as opposed to who you are. But whereas early period Martin likely would have made the mockery the overriding point, "Bowfinger" quietly opens up into something so much more soulful without shunting the humor, "debt, desperation and dreams" as the late great Roger Ebert put it.

When a filmmaker or an actor or a writer is really humming during a particular era, the works created will not merely stand on their own as genuine achievements but actually converse with one another, illustrating the core attitude of their creator and saying something far-reaching. This trinity of scripts, which I in my addled cinematic state of mind believe to be holy, eternally proved Steve Martin as more than a mere parodist and revealed his comic earnestness. It was when he stopped holding himself at a remove and instead gave himself over to us. It was when, to quote "L.A. Story", he let his mind go and allowed his body to follow.

Life is absurd and cruel, and Martin observes those facts with sharp wit, and it's complicated and infuriating, and he never denies this, but in spite of its imperfections, it is something to savor. Early in his career, "Bowfinger's" film-within-a-film, "Chubby Rain", would have been pure irony. But by 1999, by the completion of those three screenplays and the wraps of their filming, he had forged new ground. "Chubby Rain" may have been awful but it was created with good intentions, and he let those intentions win out.

And at the end, when he had breached Hollywood's walls, when he was inside the palace and had a chance to loot, pillage and plunder, he instead recited the lines that are, to me, the most moving in the Martin canon, not for their cleverness but their loving simplicity, a sign the student had become the master. "Not bad seats. Not bad seats at all."

Congratulations, Steve.

Saturday, June 11, 2011

Roxanne

When I recently visited New York three of my friends and I stopped off at a way cool Brooklyn bar for a few drinks and some food and one of the establishment’s perks was showing three simultaneous movies with a certain theme. The theme of this night was 80′s and one of the films was "The Jerk." Three of the four at our table decided "The Jerk" was the quintessential Steve Martin movie. I, of course, was the holdout. 
I believe then and believe now that "Roxanne" sits atop the formidable talent’s canon.


Sure, he’s always thought of as a funny guy, "Born Standing Up." He’s remembered for his wacky late 70′s, early 80′s comedies or his 00′s slumming for paychecks, likely to fund his art collecting. But when I think of Martin I always think of his distinct ability to blend humor with wistfulness. I think of his inate ability to play happy and sad within the same frame. I think of him with his face shrouded in the shrubs beneath Daryl Hannah’s balcony as she tells him (even though it’s not really to him) his pouring forth of his heart on paper was “eloquent” which he aptly corrects as “Not eloquent – just honest.” Steve Martin, I think, wanted to be Wordsworth as much as he wanted to be Jerry Lewis.

The film is based on the 1897 Edmond Rostand play Cyrano de Bergerac and it opens with a nod to that material as Martin’s C.D. Bales, the fire chief of a Washington ski town, finds himself in a duel opposite two lugheads with a tennis racket and ski poles substituting for rapiers. It is clever and funny. But it is the moments right before this sloped duel that interest me most – C.D. leaving his house and bopping and skipping – literally – down the street and along the sidewalk singing Fats Domino’s "I’m Walkin." You have to be of a certain unswervable disposition to sing to yourself in public. This is the portrait of a carefree man in love with life! But then the two lugheads inevitably insult the elongated nose of C.D. and while we see that he has learned how to live with this funky appendage we will soon see that he has not necessarily learned how to deal with it. 


Two outsiders change his existence. The first is Chris McConnell (Rick Rossovich), an ace firefighter who has been called in to help instruct C.D.’s rather lamentable band of firemen, a group including Michael J. Pollard, weirdly hilarious, a young Damon Wayans and the town’s mayor (Fred Williard) who is spearheading Oktoberfest and says of his uniform, in that memorable Williard-ese, “I want it to say action with style. Sort of a GQ firefighter.” And while Chris may know just how to handle a burning blaze, well, when it comes to women he makes men clueless about females look like they’re totally in control.


The other outsider is Roxanne Kowalski (Daryl Hannah), an astronomer who has arrived to view a comet she has predicted will pass soon in the sky overhead. She is disarmingly sweet, incredibly intelligent, and one of the few fashionable women who roamed the style-confused 80′s, making the jean jacket vest look as innovative as Faye Dunaway’s mini skirts and berets in "Bonnie and Clyde." Roxanne and C.D. meet cute when she gets locked out of the home she is renting……naked. Again, Martin’s screenplay indicates its intentions. This easily could have led to crude and idiotic obviousness but Martin keeps the tone light and, dare I say, character driven. He asks if she would like a coat. She says no and then when she realizes he didn’t bring him a coat says, increduously, “I was being ironic.” Martin’s reply is classic: “Oh, irony. We don’t get that here. We haven’t had irony here since 1979 when I was the only practitioner of it and I stopped because I was tired of being stared at.” 


And upon getting her back into her home with the greatest of ease, he falls for her almost instantly, and how could he not, listening to her wax rhapsodically about her passion, the manner in which he steals little glances of her as she does so, luminously subverting the cheesy 80′s score that accompanies it. One of Martin’s most brilliant decisions, and a lesson which rom com writers of the here and now should heed, was to make Chris a genuine doofus as opposed to a raging prick, his looks offset by the fact that a ridiculously attractive woman sends him running to the bathroom to hurl into a trash can. This is identifiable. Even when he tells Roxanne, in a fit of pitiful desperation, ”Your knockers are like melons” you can’t get upset because, damn it, the guy is trying his best, and it makes it much more believable that Roxanne might be attracted to him in the first place.

Of course, one of the film’s stretches is that we are asked to believe she somehow fails to recognize the fact the guy of the “Your knockers are like melons” line is not the same guy sending her flowering tomes via the U.S. Mail (remember letters? Sigh….) and spouting prose from beneath her balcony. She even recognizes this fact out loud as he’s spouting it - “Your voice is different.” Ah, but that’s the whole point, isn’t it? In the midst of their inevitable argument about C.D. actually penning the letters that made Roxanne swoon, C.D. advises the handwriting and the signature didn’t even match. How could she not have noticed? “Because you wanted to believe it!” C.D. declares. “You wanted it all! All the romance and emotion, all wrapped up in a cute little nose and a cute little ass!” Harsh, maybe, but maybe true.


Like Jesse of "Before Sunrise" declaring “People have these romantic projections they put on everything that aren’t based on any kind of reality” (guilty!) or Elaine Benes of "Seinfeld", staunchly pro choice, learning her potential one true love might well be pro life and dismissing such a possibility because, “Well, he’s just so good looking”, the movie is well aware that problems with love are not always caused through deceitfulness by the other person but often by deceitfulness within our own minds. C.D. is so convinced his super sized protuberance will prevent him from ever finding love that he has to resort to ghost writing love letters to actually tell Roxanne how he really feels. He might be that fun loving guy who sings to himself as he walks, but he’s got self doubt just like the rest of us.


That’s the Martin I most enjoy – the sentimentalist. The Harris K. Telemacher of "L.A. Story" was a wacky weatherman, sure, but he wanted to leave the wacky behind him and find something real and meaningful in the traffic sign ravaged landscape he called home. Bobby K. Bowfinger’s effort to make a film was filled with wacky hijinks, yes, but he was one man grasping at one last shot to make his one big dream come true. It’s why when I look at Martin I don’t see the guy with the arrow on his head, I see the guy with the big nose.

Which is why I dig the way he chose to end his adaptation. Cyrano de Bergerac dies but C.D. Bales gets the girl. Hollywood eloquence? Nah. Just honest.