' ' Cinema Romantico: America!!!!!
Showing posts with label America!!!!!. Show all posts
Showing posts with label America!!!!!. Show all posts

Wednesday, July 01, 2026

250 Years Burning Down the Road


I remember the exact moment when it dawned on me for the first time that I would probably not live to see the United States of America’s Tricentennial. It was my sixth-grade class with Miss Carlson, and not my fourth-grade class with the same Miss Carlson, because it was fifth grade in-between when I formed my lifelong fascination with the American War of Independence and related Founding Fathers history. And when we touched on our country’s 200th anniversary of signing the Declaration of Independence, Miss Carlson humorously noted that because everyone in the classroom was born a year or two after July 4, 1976, we would need to live to be roughly 99 years old to see the tricentennial. Everyone laughed, but I was heartbroken. I could not even conceive of 2076 in my mind at that point, but I knew it was far away and my odds of getting there were long. No, the semiquincentennial was going to have to be it for me. Little did I know that 2026 would be the year the great-great-great-great-great-grandson of King George III would appear in the district named for George Washington to subtly remind the light-of-brain 47th American President of his being a chief executive of a constitutional democracy, not a king. The British army probably did not play The World Turned Upside Down at Yorktown, the 1781 battle sealing the whole American Revolution deal, just as nobody played it after King Charles III spoke to Congress, but you could hear its figurative echo.

Of course, the older I got and the more history I read, the more I realized that missing the American Bicentennial was no tragedy. Despite something approximating its best efforts, the celebration could never expunge the pungent fumes of Watergate and Vietnam; if anything, Gerald Ford pardoning his Presidential predecessor to move on, as they say, probably only made the stench worse. What’s more, in a real what’s old is new sort of situation, the Bicentennial being used to sell so much commemorative schlock echoes our current President hawking his own Freedom 250™ crap. Perhaps our country has always been about crass commercialism as much as constitutionalism. The big exposition of 1876 meant to celebrate the American Centennial, meanwhile, was as much a for-profit trade show as much as anything, and while the Civil War was technically in the rearview mirror, Jim Crow was just ramping up. (It might be ramping up again.) The sesquicentennial in 1926 was deemed America’s Greatest Flop. All this got me to thinking about my favorite July Fourths. I liked the one where my parents threw a party and my dad’s best friend brought his ice cream maker; I liked the one where a couple of my friends and I went and saw “Terminator 3” in lieu of fireworks; I liked the one where My Beautiful, Perspicacious Wife and I went to a small carnitas place where the air conditioning barely worked and then we watched A Capitol Fourth on PBS and went to bed early. Maybe the less momentous the 4th of July, the more memorable.


Just as the founders erected figurative guardrails to hold the country together, I find myself wondering if the Divine Providence namechecked in our declaration incorporates bad feelings if not outright existential threats to ensure our biggest national celebratory milestones are mindful rather than mindless. Yet, even if we accept this premise, it seems like Divine Providence laid it on a little thick for 250. After all, our nation’s capital was specifically designed by Pierre L’Enfant to evoke constitutional democracy and yet our know-nothing President has spent the run-up to the semiquincentennial running roughshod over Washington D.C. He trashed the White House ellipse for a bloody spectacle as glorification of his massive ego and reduced its east wing to rubble to construct a ballroom less about security than blighting the people’s house for eternity. (At least all the tacky gold accents the President is supergluing himself to walls inside 1600 Pennsylvania Ave will probably just fall off themselves.) He has put his name and face on every building he can, trying to make the nation state synonymous with himself, commandeered the National Mall for a pitiful semiquincentennial fair that is glorious only in the pudding where his brain should be, and sought to plant 47 trees in Lafayette Park to remake the nationally protected public space named for America’s greatest friend in liberty in his own image. He has brayed about constructing a 250-foot arch which he undoubtedly believes will be his own gold-accented pyramid to earn his way to the afterlife while his attempts to transform the Lincoln Memorial Reflecting Pool into the MGM Grand Pool Complex in Las Vegas by draining it and painting the bottom so-called American Flag Blue instead turned the whole thing Hi-C Ecto Cooler green and became the ultimate reflection of his T*ump-brand tyranny, self-perceived infallibility, blatant grift, and awe-inspiring incompetence colliding to manifest uproarious, infuriating, depressing unintentional comedy and conspiracy theories. The Iran War and the reflecting pool are hardly the same, but also, you can see how the former would have been something conducted by the person responsible for the latter. He repeatedly claims to be a builder, but his greatest gift is for destruction. 

As the President went about laying waste, Bruce Springsteen exercised his constitutional right to protest about it by taking to the road in April and May for the Land of Hope and Dreams American Tour (slogan: No Kings), including the United Center in Chicago in late April where I saw him. Wearing a black vest over a white button-town and black tie and indulging in several between-song monologues expressing his belief in core American values, he cut the image of a revivalist preacher whose text was the Constitution rather than the Bible. His air was less spirited than solemn, however, and frankly, the music and the way he structured his setlist said what needed to be said all on its own. He made his anti-ICE protest anthem “Streets of Minneapolis” a centerpiece, but objectively, it paled when put side-by-side with his earlier work, putting into perspective how his own songbook was already built for this moment. That howl of desperation for “The Promised Land” never hit so hard, the contradictions of “No Surrender” were never so poignant, and a full band “Ghost of Tom Joad” in which Bruce let co-star Tom Morello cook on guitar was electrifying, not so much summoning the specter of the eponymous “Grapes of Wrath” character as reminding us he was still there, in Minneapolis and in Memphis and in Chicago. He was probably at the reflecting pool, too, maybe played by Will Ferrell instead of Henry Fonda, incredulous, but there. “Wherever there’s a national guardsman, ma, yawning with nothing to do, I’ll be there.”


Nothing hit harder than “Wrecking Ball.” Springsteen has composed quite a few politically motivated songs in the new century, though none have proven more durable as a 21st century American national anthem than “Wrecking Ball.” Written in the fall of 2009 when he and The E Street Band played a five-night stand to close Giants Stadium in East Rutherford, New Jersey ahead of its demolition the ensuing year, the eventual title track of his 2012 album anthropomorphizes an 80,000-seat concrete edifice as it defiantly stares down its own imminent destruction. It sounds impossible, such a song working at all, and even with a powerhouse performance by The E Street Band, the subject matter can make for some clunky lines. But Springsteen is a keen songwriter and he knows that the reverence Americans tend to feel for certain sports stadiums allows the song to work as a broader allegory of recalcitrant institutions and the implacable forces that would seek to destroy them, and that even if they succeed, a deeper and stronger spirit prevails. Indeed, “Wrecking Ball” is not elegiac but jubilant, evinced in its f major chord and in the climactic solo call and response of “hard times come and hard times go” five times fast giving life to that endless American ebb and flow, punctuated by taunting the wrecking ball to bring it on, suggesting that whatever you can destroy, we can rebuild, achieving something I am positive only Bruce Springsteen could: effecting Alexis de Tocqueville’s famed observation that American democracy’s special sauce is “being able to repair the faults (it) may commit” as a rock and roll anthem told from the perspective of a football stadium. 

“Wrecking Ball’s” message of “hold(ing) tight to your anger and (not falling) to your fear” can admittedly sound of its time, the wake of the 2008 Financial Crisis and the early days of the Obama administration, when fanciful words like hope and change were in the air. Those eventually ran up against the hard but necessary realities of political compromise but more than that, the 44th President never seemed to see, or maybe just never could bring himself to believe the dark forces that were conspiring against his rosy vision. And yet, at the recent opening of his presidential library, he struck the same optimistic tone that first made him famous, in a way evoking why so many young people are obsessed these days with the twenty-tens. It felt better. Of course, such nostalgia can feel naive, and so did President Obama’s optimism, frankly, in advance of Freedom 250™. That sort of tension, though, between belief and a lack of it, animated our founding, and has been animating us ever since, and has animated Bruce Springsteen’s music too, whether or not people have allowed themselves to hear it. He has written constantly about the dark side of America, and at the same time, he has never stopped believing in it, the famed arc of justice always at a standstill, as it was on April 29th at the United Center. He said his piece about current affairs, but he structured his setlist to let a little light back in when things got dark. He held tight to his anger; he refused to fall to his fear. 


Famously, the 555-foot Washington Monument was designed by Robert Mills not to instill a sense of triumph but uplift, the emphasis of its verticality carrying your eyes up toward the sky as if appealing to our better angels. In recent times, however, with the apathy, obsequiousness, and whole-hearted shamelessness that has settled over not just our politics but civic life, it has been hard not to feel as if our better angels have taken their harps and gone home. If I have not always believed in the country itself, I have always believed in the idea of this country, though after so much of the citizenry’s collective shrugging off of January 6th as no big deal, I confess, I have never struggled to maintain belief so much. Does an idea cease to be enough when the ensuing course of action drifts so far from it? A funny thing happened, though, when My Beautiful, Perspicacious Wife and I recently returned her hometown of Washington D.C. We were coming back from dinner in Alexandria in a car and I realized that from certain vantage points, all the construction, cranes, and fencing that currently blot the capital’s landscape disappeared and left only a view of the Washington Monument, an impervious, immovable testament to its namesake’s intrinsic example that no one man is greater than the country. And for those few moments I did not hear the echoes of The World Turned Upside Down but of Bruce Springsteen, daring our wannabe fascist of a President to bring on his wrecking ball.

 

Thursday, September 20, 2018

First Man: Flag Quotient

You might recall that a few weeks back, after its premiere at the Venice Film Festival, the forthcoming Damien Chazelle film “First Man”, chronicling the fairly familiar tale of Neil Armstrong becoming, ahem, the first man to walk on the moon, The Saturday Evening Post’s chief film critic Marco Rubio took said film to task, sight unseen, mind you, for its refusal to show the moment in which Mr. Armstrong planted an American flag on the lunar surface. Rubio tweeted the following: “This is total lunacy.” (Pun?!) “And a disservice at a time when our people need reminders of what we can achieve when we work together. The American people paid for that mission,on rockets built by Americans, with American technology & carrying American astronauts. It wasn’t a UN mission.”

And yet, this past weekend I happened to catch the new TV spot for “First Man”, which conspicuously hit airwaves not long after the aforementioned brou-ha-ha, and proceeded to count not one-


-not two-


-but three American flags.


Three American flags in a 30 second spot! That is one American flag every 10 seconds! That is an American flag ratio one normally associates with Michael Bay, the salt of the earth’s own! And while I would like nothing more than to imply these three American flags rebut Mr. Rubio’s argument, well, it is merely a TV spot, and I have yet to see the movie, meaning I cannot place any of these flags, accounted for or not, in proper context. I would like to think someone holding as prestigious a postion as The Saturday Evening Post’s chief film critic might agree, but apparently not. And if upon seeing the movie, he chooses to reverse course, well, this wouldn’t be the first time Mr. Rubio made a proclamation only to actually discover the evidence ruled his original proclamation out of order.

Wednesday, July 04, 2018

keira knightley as an american

It’s the Fourth of July, Independence Day here in the States, yada yada, and so here’s a picture of this blog’s British beloved in “Jack Ryan: Shadow Recruit” (2014) playing an American character since we would not want to offend any delicate sensibilities by posting a picture of this blog’s British beloved playing a British character since, hey, did you know, we won the war, not them, it’s true, not a lot of people know that.


Monday, February 06, 2017

To Cancel the Oscars or Not to Cancel the Oscars

What if no one showed up?
When it was announced that Asghar Farhadi, the exceptional Iranian filmmaker whose “The Salesmen” was just nominated for a Best Foreign Language Picture Oscar, would boycott the upcoming Academy Awards in light of the fact that he might not even be allowed to enter the U.S. in the first place given President Donald Trump’s ban on refugees, the calls for cancelling the ceremony entirely were inevitable. “Here’s a suggestion,” tweeted film critic Glenn Kenny in the aftermath of the Farhadi news, “in solidarity with Asghar Farhadi, cancel the Oscars. Refuse to ‘entertain’ under these conditions.” Dana Stevens Tweeted something similar. Todd VanDerWerff took the baton at Vox and wrote a full length piece titled, simply, “Cancel the Oscars.” And even if VanDerWerff confessed that the “Oscars probably won’t be canceled” given the money and contracts at stake, which always override everything else, he was pretty adamant in his belief that mere televised protests between bouts of regularly scheduled Oscar fluff wouldn’t be enough. He had some suggestions. Those suggestions led to a roundtable at The AV Club and Slate inevitably offering its variation of You’re Protesting Wrong, and so on and so forth.

Academy-styled protest always makes me think of Steve Martin’s line when he hosted in 2003. In the aftermath of Iraq War II commencing, the Oscar powers that be decided to put away the red carpet. “That’ll show ‘em!” Steve Martin declared in an immaculate deadpan. True. What are the Oscars if not frivolity turned up to Eleven? Of course, I often like to quote Nicole Kidman winning Best Actress at those same Oscars and wondering why they were there and citing the importance of art. That’ll get a few eyerolls, sure, and the more time that passes the more I realize the Oscars themselves are less about art, per se, even if I do agree whole-heartedly that art is important and is worth celebrating. And that is why I might suggest, hey, ABC, make an exception and just show “La La Land” and “Moonlight” and “Finding Dory” back to back to back in lieu of the ceremony. The Oscars don’t matter, wrote raconteur Richard Brody in the wake of their nomination announcement, but the movies do. If Trump gets to watch “Finding Dory” for free while the world is going to hell then let us do it too!

That’s not feasible, I know. So, what is? We Liberal Snowflakes™ adored Meryl Streep’s call for empathy at the Golden Globes, even as she un-empathetically lambasted football and MMA, though many naturally crowed that it didn’t accomplish anything, though it did accomplish something by leading to a surge in donations for the Committee to Protect Journalists (which Streep name checked), though no doubt those who crowed that Streep’s speech didn’t accomplish anything would tell you the Committee to Protect Journalists is just protecting the FAKE NEWS of the Mainstream Press and {zzzzzzzzzz). But hey, donations are a good thing. Maybe all the nominees could get together and pledge that whoever wins uses their speech solely to cite the ACLU and CAIR and Planned Parenthood, etc. Maybe the curtain is thrown open as the telecast begins and George Clooney and Julia Roberts are standing there and suddenly we realize the entire telecast is now actually going to be a telethon. Maybe the four (five? six?) hours scheduled could just be blacked out with a Donate Here icon on the screen. Maybe midway through the usual pomp and circumstance the cackling visage of Tom Arnold suddenly shows up on screen, Shosanna Dreyfus style, as he vengefully unleashes the secret Apprentice tapes of Trump on an unsuspecting America.


And let’s be honest, protesting or shouting from the pulpit with a statue in hand, let alone cancelling the Oscars, isn’t going to change anyone’s mind about anything. If you wanted to donate to CAIR to begin with, you probably would; if you thought CAIR was a terrorist organization to begin with, a plea on the organization’s behalf by Scarlett Johansson ain’t making a damn bit of difference. Scan any bastion of interwebs conservatism and you will find their response in the wake of this cry for cancelling the Oscars is simply to laugh at all the Cosmopolitan Intellectual Elites taking each other’s work in movies “no one has seen” so seriously. I assure you, the majority of them think it’s pretty damn funny that we are wringing our hands over a ceremony they generally do not care about in the best of times. Cancel the whole soiree and they will fill social media with emojis of “libturd tears.”

Of course, what I find funny is that a lot of leftist pushback against the Academy Awards is not dissimilar to rightist pushback. Seriously, scrolling through Twitter during any recent Oscar telecast would have shown Liberal Snowflakes™ making a lot of the same sorts of jokes that young conservatives are making in the wake of this Cancel the Oscars hullabaloo - you know, the rampant back-patting, prima donnas thanking their agents, millionaires and their bags of swag, self-indulgent montages, etc. We are not so different, them and us. The Oscars have always existed as a dumping ground for so much of what so many who follow Hollywood so closely abhor about the industry and they have always existed as a dumping ground for so much of what so many who hate Hollywood so much abhor about the industry and those who follow it. So why cancel the Oscars?!

Why not let them go on as usual, with anyone wanting to make a statement making a statement, and Jimmy Kimmel functioning as a typical Oscar host, left to founder an impossible job, becoming our divided nation’s scapegoat for one evening, symbolically burdened with our leftist and rightist vitriol, momentarily uniting in the common cause of an unfunny enemy. And then in the morning, while he’s flipping between Fox News and CNN (which he doesn’t watch anymore), Trump can fire off a few tweets about the couple jokes directed at his vainglory by Kimmel and tweet some patented gobbledygook about Kimmel being overrated and then we can all sigh loudly and re-engage with our ongoing national cold war.


Monday, July 04, 2016

Happy 4th of July



Petty Cash. Chinese Food. Budweiser™. America.

Friday, December 19, 2014

Movies Lost Way Before Terrorists Won



"One could even argue that there’s an element of karmic payback at work here for all the greed and carelessness and calculated idiocy of Hollywood – as they have sown, so also shall they reap, or whatever. Except what, exactly, have they reaped? I guess the titans of America’s culture industry, which is about the only area of manufacturing where we still rule the world, have been revealed as stupid and calculating and driven by fear, as chickenshits who can’t even successfully pretend to believe in the value of their own products. We should have known that already, but maybe the reminder is useful." - Andrew O'Hehir, Salon 


Thursday, July 04, 2013

Happy 4th of July!

It's America's birthday, and nothing says "AMERICA!!!!!" quite like Tom Cruise in Ray Bans in front of an American flag.