' ' Cinema Romantico: Robert DeNiro
Showing posts with label Robert DeNiro. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Robert DeNiro. Show all posts

Thursday, December 07, 2017

We Are Grateful For... Tom Hanks

Do we under-appreciate Tom Hanks? This is the question before us today, a question that my beautiful girlfriend has answered with a definitive “Yes” several times over the course of our relationship, including just recently, which got me to thinking about it too, but also thinking about something else that I will address in a minute because first, Hanks. Culturally, I think, Tom Hanks remains quite appreciated, often cited, as he was in a recent Saturday Night Live sketch, as America’s Dad. Of course, the phrase America’s Dad sort of intrinsically suggests someone apart from his acting contemporaries. Hanks simply emits a different vibe from, say, the twitchy edginess of Joaquin Phoenix, or the hipster social media cred of Michael Shannon, or the high watt regality of Michael Fassbender. Even when you see Tom Hanks in a suit, and you usually do, his aura suggests he is wearing a sweater, cozy, familar.


That sensation is furthered by his recent films, helmed by the grandfatherly guard of Steven Spielberg and Clint Eastwood, in which Hanks played real-life middle-aged, All-American heroes James Donovan and Chesley “Sully” Sullenberger, never mind another appearance as Robert Langdon in “Inferno”, the hero of Dan Brown’s airport rack novel series, the very epitome of the entertainment proletariat. I have not seen “Inferno” but Hanks was excellent in both “Bridge of Spies” and “Sully”, never metaphorically shouting all his dialogue through a Stars & Stripes bullhorn in the former and quietly illustrating the controlled nature of his character that allowed him to do what he did in the latter, and he was even better in the otherwise mostly mushy “Saving Mr. Banks” as none other than Walt Disney, knifing under the skin of that infamous entertainer ever so delicately to unearth deeper shades.

But then, these performances do not completely transcend his outward America’s Dad Hanks-iness, just as his forthcoming turn as Ben Bradlee in “The Post” does not really either. With, say, Daniel Day-Lewis, you can really get traction on his transformations whereas Hanks has not really taken that sort of acting deep dive since he grew a beard and got thin for “Cast Away.” (Hanks does, however, remain the master of the regional American accent.) And while Day-Lewis’s infamous long breaks between films, and his engimatic disappearances from the public eye during those breaks, seems to engender a cavalcade of (oft-deserved) superlatives every time he re-emerges, Hanks always remains very much here, and if his new performances are always acknowledged, they are never quite baroquely extolled, just sort of rendering Hanks the Actor in the public imagination as is.

Time, of course, cuts different ways. Time has, in many ways, taken the luster off Robert DeNiro, brought about by less than savory performances in less than savory films, which too often temper the good performances he can still give, fading away rather burning out. Yet, twenty years ago DeNiro did not exist in pop culture as a fallen titan. If anything, DeNiro’s Italian surname had taken on almost mythical connotations. To burgeoning semi-cinemaphiles such as myself, to say his name was to immediately conjure mental images of Jimmy Conway standing at the bar staring down Morrie or Johnny Boy blowing up the mailbox. He loomed so large culturally that his new performances, while not necessarily measured against those of his past, still tended to invite a kind of broader complacency.

Indeed, the historical Hollywood texts will show that 1997 supporting male performances like Robin Williams in “Good Will Hunting” and Burt Reynolds in “Boogie Nights” and Kevin Spacey in “L.A. Confidential” were the primary focus of awards. Little mention, alas, was made of Robert DeNiro’s two turn winter in “Jackie Brown” and “Wag the Dog.” Why his “Jackie Brown” co-star Robert Forster earned an Academy Award nomination as did his “Wag the Dog” co-star Dustin Hoffman, but not DeNiro himself. Why not?


In “Jackie Brown” as lifelong criminal Louis Gara, DeNiro was deliberately hunched in his posture and slow-witted in both his manner and speech, sort of mumbling in half-sentences and always seeming to be half-second behind whatever anyone was trying to communicate to him, behavior deftly evoking a man who had spent much of his life behind bars and without much beyond the most primitive contact. In “Wag the Dog” as vaguely defined yet conspicuously powerful political operative Conrad Brean, on the other hand, DeNiro spoke with great alacrity and clarity while simultaneously utilizing all manner of little bodily tics to indicate someone sizing you and everything else to ensure he stays one step ahead.

Released within a week or so of one another, these two performances could not have been any different (in fact, a year later, in “Ronin”, DeNiro would more or less meld these two performances into one, playing a less talkative guy who was highly observant) and yet, while there was less fly-by-night awards punditry then exists now, I remember thinking it odd that neither of DeNiro’s turns were being hailed like so many others. Time had not passed him by, yet it had caused him, a la Hanks, to settle as he was, a great actor giving great performances, which was understood if not quite recognized, simply accepted as the status quo. I am not suggesting that Hanks is about to go the way of DeNiro, not at all, simply seeking to remind ourselves that even as Hanks assumes this role of cultural capstone he very much remains a working actor.

It’s nice that he’s America’s Dad; I’m happier he’s Ben Bradlee.

Wednesday, April 02, 2014

The Cinema Romantico Action Hero Championship Belt

You might have heard that Bill Simmons, The Sports Guy, Grantland founder, recently threw up a mammoth article on his site in which he re-imagined the Action Movie Star as a sort of Heavyweight Champion. His argument is that the Hollywood action hero as we know him and her began in 1968 with Steve McQueen's "Bullit" and so he goes from there, naming champion after champion. It's a typical Simmons list, not at all wholly inaccurate, but spotty on its real movie history (such as giving the belt to Jackie Chan for "Rush Hour 3" as opposed to any of his Hong Kong efforts) and littered with head-scratching decisions such as Sylvester Stallone re-claiming the belt in 1996 for "Daylight" (wait, what?).

His list, as it had to, got me to thinking. It got me to thinking: what if Cinema Romantio had its own Action Hero Championship Belt? You know, like this blog was a fly-by-night fringe boxing council - The Kremlin-Calexico International Boxing Federation - that awarded its own title belt that absolutely nobody - including the recipients, who would in all likelihood decline it - took seriously or even paid attention to? A champion's list that made people reading it think, "Who the hell made this list? What is with this guy?" Ah, now that sounds like the Cinema Romantico Action Hero Championship Belt!

ac·tion he·ro
     1. Ineffable
      "that's my favorite action hero!"

The Cinema Romantico Action Hero Championship Belt (established 1977)


Harrison Ford. 1977 - 1988.
For: "Star Wars Trilogy", "Raiders of the Lost Ark."


Bruce Willis. 1988 - 1992.
For: "Die Hard."


Daniel Day-Lewis. 1992 - 1998.
For: "Last of the Mohicans."


Robert DeNiro. 1998 - 2000.
For: "Ronin."


Zhang Ziyi. 2000 - 2003.
For: "Crouching Tiger, Hidden Dragon."


Johnny Depp. 2003 -  2005.
For: "Pirates of the Caribbean: Curse of the Black Pearl."


Matt Damon. 2005 - 2010.
For: "The Bourne Supremacy", "The Bourne Ultimatum."


Angelina Jolie. 2010 - Present.
For: "Salt" (and general contributions to global badassery)

Wednesday, September 14, 2011

Heat

A semi truck resting beneath a freeway overpass barrels out from its hiding spot, directly toward an unsuspecting armored car that has stopped in the middle of the road for a stolen ambulance. The semi truck rams the armored car and sends it toppling onto its side and skidding into a line of cars at a nearby dealership. Finally, the armored car comes to a stop and as it does the festive blue ribbon that had been displayed above the gleaming automobiles softly falls to the cement. That’s the moment. The ribbon falling ever so softly. People are about to get shot, bearer bonds are about to be stolen and, of course, an armored car just got jacked up, but Michael Mann, writer and director, still pays attention to the tiniest of details, over and over, throughout, the way one seemingly random word can mean all the difference, the way a pair of sunglasses removed translates that someone is not to be trifled with, and turns them into poetry. None of his contemporaries and few of his predecessors, if I may be so bold, capture the intimate, intricate details quite like Mann, nor shape their stories so not even the slightest indispensable stroke is missing. Is it any wonder then that this sprawling saga of Cops and Robbers focuses on two protagonists who are obsessed with the details?


The Robber is Neil McCauley (Robert DeNiro) whose attitudes toward female companionship and home furniture are identical (“When I get around to it”). He sees mostly everything, misses much of nothing, and adheres to a rigorous personal code so infamous that the James Franco character in Date Night actually quoted it. He can be gentlemanly, so gentlemanly that in the midst of a robbery he declares “We want to hurt no one” but he can he also be ruthless, so ruthless that only seconds after proclaiming they want to hurt no one he smashes a bank employee’s jaw. The Cop is Vincent Hanna (Al Pacino), demonstrative, a bit vulgar, compulsive gum chewer, and passing his third wife Justine (Diane Venora) on the “downslope” of their marriage partly because he says – actually says to his wife – that he needs his angst.


McCauley’s crew is high-tech and tight-knit but admits a fifth man for the armored car take down that does not go down quite right and results in three murders that results in Hanna and his team taking the case. They seem nearly as high-tech and tight-knit and just as obsessive which, of course, yields an epic tug-of-war. In one breathless passage of time about an hour in, the film reverses its tracks three times. As Hanna closes in on his target to make the bust of the century one minor slip-up causes McCauley to pull the plug on a particular heist – leading to the most dramatic face off in cinematic history in which the two men facing off are not in the same room – which reverses when McCauley and crew cleverly unmask the identity of their pursuers which reverses when Hanna tracks down McCauley on the L.A. freeway and asks, gun nestled firmly in hand, in that memorable Pacino-an, “What do ya say I buy ya a cup of coffee?”

From the opening credits revealing the actors’ names the audience knows all along that Cop and Robber must come face to face, not simply because they are Cop and Robber but because they are Pacino and DeNiro, perhaps the two greatest actors of their era (and at the time of the film’s release not recognized as the slumming ex-heavyweight champs they are now), and this is the first time they had ever shared the screen in the same film. Mann sets the scene in an entirely ordinary coffee shop because, as he would explain, there could be nothing to distract from the simple fact these two were squaring off on the cinematic hardwood. And it is spellbinding, both in acting and in writing and in the way the larger message becomes apparent, the fact that these two men are the same and need one another as badly as they need to eliminate one another.

But what might most be telling about this unforgettable passage is that while just about any other filmmaker, established or not, Oscar winner or never nominated, would have made it the point, the whole point and nothing but the point, Michael Mann presents it as but one more detail – however monumental – in the narrative. For such two larger-than-life figures at the core, "Heat" is about so much more than just hard-headed guys on the prowl.


McCauley’s crew includes Chris Shiherlis (Val Kilmer), a gambling junkie, married to Charlene (Ashley Judd), who have a young son, Dominic, who at times, sadly, disturbingly, seems more like a chip on a gaming table than an actual living, breathing human being. Their first scene transitions, jarringly, from lovey-dovey to full-blown argument as Chris breaks household items just to break household items and storms out. But in his next scene with McCauley, functioning as mentor, Chris says, quietly but firmly, in those of those majestic Mann lines that is age-old but so relevant: “For me the sun rises and sets with her, man.” And that’s it. That’s all we need to know. That’s why in the end, after it’s all gone terribly wrong, after he has a chance to make a clean escape, Chris goes after Charlene anyway, which leads to Charlene on a balcony and, in an instant, even after all the shit he’s put her through, waving Chris away. It’s miniscule, barely there, wouldn’t even register to most guys wearing the headphones and watching the dailies and sending interns for lattes, but in "Heat" this lone wave of the hand, coupled with Judd’s and Kilmer's expressive pain, wrenches your gut like real life.

Michael Churrido (Tom Sizemore) might be the most emblematic at all, the endless ex-con, in and out of prison, who has settled into the most normal life possible under the guidance of McCauley, finding a potential wife with a couple kids he seems to love, putting away money, but upon finding himself with a chance to walk away – in Sizemore’s 30 greatest seconds of screen time ‘ever’, including everything in Saving Private Ryan – declaring instead, “For me, the action is the juice.”

Is the action the juice for McCauley? Well, he does finally get around to female companionship when he hooks up with the polite but incredibly shy Eady (Amy Brenneman) who approaches him at a coffee shop, trying to Meet Cute with him even though, in her own words, “I’m not very good at meeting people.” They make a strange but strangely appealing couple, two kindred spirits in the terrifying realm of lonliness, a fact which will eventually pit McCauley one on one with his personal code.

Even then there are two more characters perhaps generally described as minor who are anything but. Don Breeman (Dennis Haysbert) is another ex-con, out on parole and taking a job as a line cook for a thankless, crooked taskmaster (Bud Cort) whose connection to the rest of the film’s mammoth story seems uncertain but will eventually fall into place. This subplot could have been forced, existing solely out of necessity, but instead in a manner of four scenes becomes a full-fledged, tragic arc that crystallizes Who We Are is What We Will Always Be and comes to a head in a sequence with no music score between Haysbert and DeNiro – “One answer. Right now. Yes or no.” – in which the camera captures a multitude of angles of the two men as it all hangs in the balance. A nothing moment becomes absolutely everything.

And then there is Lauren Gustafson (Natalie Portman), Justine’s teenage daughter, the Alice Munro of Heat, needy and edgy, primarily because she is neglected by her real father, who we never see, as well as neglected by Justine and by Vincent, too, as she sinks further and further into this abyss no one seems to recognize is there until her stepfather sees her sitting all alone on a bus bench in the middle of nowhere, rocking back and forth, and picks her up. The expression on Pacino’s face is only for a second but in that second we realize he is the only one able to recognize what is going and what might be about to happen except, of course, all he has is “what I’m going after” and Lauren is forgotten until it is nearly too late.

Yes, yes, yes, Hanna and McCauley will stalk each other with guns (notice how Mann’s script makes mention of the hotel as being the Airport Marquis – details, details, details), yet I can’t help but feel there is so much more to that climactic moment of the Conqueror taking the Vanquished’s hand as the stately music score swells. He got what he was going after but you hope and pray that what he’s really thinking of is that little girl back at the hospital who might survive but still needs help to live and, thus, that when he lets go of the other guy’s hand maybe, just maybe, he will let go of his angst, too.


Eleven years after "Heat" Michael Mann made the cinematic version of "Miami Vice" and in it there is a shot where the Colin Farrell character, a vice detective on the verge of going undercover, and his associates are talking with an informant and as they do, Farrell, briefly, looks out the informant’s condo window at the ocean which is just out there, you know, being the ocean. His eyes narrow as if he’s looking really hard at something and then he turns away.

In "Heat" there is a shot where McCauley, after he has met with his main man (Jon Voight, Method to the max), returns home and goes to the window and the camera focuses, intensely, on the right side of his face before the focus flips and we realize he is staring out at the ocean which is just out there, you know, being the ocean. Essentially it is the same shot in two different films. What’s out there? What do they see? I don’t think we’re meant to know. I think it’s something we can’t see, something we could never hope to see, something we wouldn’t understand if we could see.

I think it’s something only Michael Mann can see.