' ' Cinema Romantico: Michael Bay
Showing posts with label Michael Bay. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Michael Bay. Show all posts

Tuesday, July 01, 2014

The One Thing Michael Bay Didn't Blow Up

“Candlestick (Park) is the sporting equivalent of the mythical island of Manikoora. You remember the movie: In the beginning, lovely sarong-wrapped Dorothy Lamour gambols in the sun; in the end she is lashed to a tree as the hurricane threatens to blast her to eternity.” – Ron Fimrite, Sports Illustrated

“KAPOW BOOM BLAMMO CRASHHHHHHHH. EXPLOSIONS EVERYWHERE, ALL OVER, EXPLOSIONS! EXPLOSIONS OF LOVE AND GOOD THOUGHTS AND HAPPINESS AND CHEER! BOOM! BANG!” – Jack Urwin, explaining to The Guardian why he loves Michael Bay 


Candlestick Park, the former home of the baseball Giants and football 49er’s in San Francisco, is set to be imploded in 2015, which to most is probably about 55 years too late. Which is strange because Candlestick Park was, in fact, christened 55 years before 2015 – 1960, to be precise, and from that moment forward was the windiest, coldest and most reviled baseball stadium ever dreamt up. Ron Fimrite, in fact, wrote the above statement in 1986, close to thirty years ago, meaning that in spite of being so hated, The 'Stick's outdated facilities still held on this long, in a woefully blustery spot by the bay in a bad part of town with bad traffic where no one really wanted to go.


Michael Bay is, of course, our pre-eminent Movie Explosion Maker. Three years ago, in fact, Jeffrey Frankenhauser compiled an infographic study of the correlation between Bay’s explosions and box office. In the graph, he notes that Bay’s films had accounted for a total of 992 explosions, or, in his words, “more than one explosion for each of Bay’s nine films.” “The Rock”, however, Mr. Bay’s second feature film, released in 1996, checks in on the chart with his second lowest explosions total with a mere 22, alarming not necessarily because there were not a great many additional things going kablooey but because there was not, simply, one more.

“The Rock” featured Alcatraz and its 81 tourists being taken hostage by a deranged if idealistic General Francis X. Hummel (Ed Harris) in a vainglorious attempt to get the American government to pony up a stockpile of cash and transfer it to the relatives who were never compensated for the deaths of their military spouses in combat. He intends to force their hand by threatening to launch a cache of seriously lethal VX gas–armed M55 rockets toward the City by the Bay. And sure enough, when his demands are not met by his chosen deadline, he launches a rocket.

But to where? At what? “Football game,” says FBI Special Agent Ernest Paxton (William Forsythe). At which point, Michael Bay cuts to a shot of the rocket up above and about to descend upon Candlestick Park.


Alas, General Hummel, proving he has a beating heart beneath those fatigues, manually re-alters the rocket's course and sends it soaring harmlessly out over the Pacific Ocean. And hey, that's swell. Really, it is. Prevention of needless death is a good thing. But then, needless death has never much concerned Mr. Bay, has it? As Mr. Frankenhauser documents in his infograph, there have been a grand total of 653 onscreen deaths in Bay films. And that, of course, as the statistic implies, does not account for off screen deaths - like, say, the entire 14 million population of Shanghai in “Armageddon”. A few arbitrary on/off screen deaths have never mattered much to Michael Bay.

That is not intended as a criticism in this context. Honest, it's not. To be sure, I have bemoaned many times before just how little death at the movies means anymore, and Mr. Bay is one of those responsible for this suppression of meaning. Still, his movies, as he has so often declared through a theoretical press junket bullhorn, are meant for teenage boys. Loss of life in his work is just CGI collateral damage. Which is precisely what makes it so furiously stupefying that he, Michael Bay, Sensei of the Explosion, the dude who blew up the Mir Space Station for absolutely no other reason than to force-feed a little extra "suspense" into a plot that was already about, you know, ARMAGEDDON, hit the re-route switch and had that VX gas–armed M55 rocket swing wide of Candlestick Park.

The one man most suited for the job of demolishing the most abhorred stadium in history in a single swift stroke politely declined. Who says Michael Bay doesn't get irony?

Wednesday, April 23, 2014

Michael Bay, Vintage 2014

A review of the teaser trailer for "Transformers: Age of Extinction" by Jacques Smelling in this month's Bon Appétit Magazine...


"Flabby notes of trench coats ominously flapping in the breeze."



"Tart tones of fast-moving SUV's kicking up dust." 


"A rather briery Slow Motion Explosion Flee."


"Frustratingly acidic contractually obligated 'OH MY GOD!!!!!' from respected actor."


"Quick pan of concerned, frenzied hair female with American flag in background. Unevolved. Undrinkable."

Wednesday, April 24, 2013

Unfortunately, Michael Bay Remains Very Proud Of Armageddon


Since the inception of Cinema Romantico it is no secret that Michael Bay has been its official Public Enemy #1. This is because he made “Pearl Harbor”, a travesty that was the cinematic equivalent of slogging up a muddy hill in leg irons while doped up on nighttime Tylenol. This is because he is the only director living or dead who could have made a film that segued straight from a car chase to a car chase even when the theater projectionist had mixed up reels. This is because he claimed both Nicolas Cage and Ben Affleck were not “big actor(s)” until he cast them in, respectively, "The Rock" and "Armageddon" despite the fact they had BOTH WON OSCARS BEFORE HE CAST THEM. But mostly he is Cinema Romantico’s Public Enemy #1 because he made “Armageddon.”

“Armageddon” is the worst movie I’ve ever seen, and when I say it’s the worst movie I’ve ever seen what I mean is that I believe “Armageddon” signifies every single thing that is so terribly wrong about the current entity that we call Hollywood. I hate “Armageddon.” I hate it, I hate it, I hate it. I hate it because it is incoherently edited, cluelessly structured, shot in Bay's patented Airplane Vomit Bag Vérité and filled with dialogue that counts as dialogue the way a sponge counts as an organism. I hate it because people who attempt to defend its merit to me do so on the grounds that “at least it knows what it is.” I hate this argument because “Armageddon” HAS NO IDEA WHAT IT IS!!! It’s so desperate to appease everyone in a shameless grab for box office that it tries to be EVERYTHING at once and fails at ALL of it! Mindless escapism is not the same as god awful. To quote the late, great Roger Ebert: “The movie is an assault on the eyes, the ears, the brain, common sense and the human desire to be entertained."


Well, on Monday it was reported that Hollywood's Grand Chancellor Of Explosions Michael Bay was actually APOLOGIZING for "Armageddon." He said: “I will apologize for Armageddon, because we had to do the whole movie in 16 weeks. ... That was not fair to the movie. I would redo the entire third act if I could. But the studio literally took the movie away from us. It was terrible. My visual effects supervisor had a nervous breakdown, so I had to be in charge of that. I called James Cameron and asked ‘What do you do when you’re doing all the effects yourself?’ But the movie did fine.”    

Never mind that in his apology Michael Bay tossed off a backdoor brag (he did all the effects himself), publicized his apparent visual effects supervisor's nervous breakdown (cuz Michael Bay's classy, yo) and that by only saying he would redo the third act conveniently seemed to ignore his movie's other fatal issues (for instance, the first and second acts). No, he had least said the words "I will apologize for Armageddon." It was a start.

It wasn't. Yesterday Hollywood's Grand Chancellor Of Explosions Michael Bay took to his own website to clarify the matter. I reprint his statement below verbatim.

"One press writer has gone too far in reporting false information. He has printed the bare minimum of my statement which in effect have twisted my words and meaning. I’m not in the slightest going to apologize for the third movie in my movie career, a film called Armageddon. On the red carpet for Pain & Gain some reporters asked me what are you apologizing for, and I said what on earth are you talking about?

What I clearly said to the reporter, is I wish I had more time to edit the film, specifcally the the third act. He asked me in effect what would you change if you could in your movies if you could go back. I said, I wish we had a few more weeks in the edit room on Armageddon. And still today Armageddon, is still one of the most shown movies on cable TV. And yes, I’m proud of the movie. Enough said.

Michael"

Oh, Mike. We were so close to being friends. (We weren't.)